ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Boudnik <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: website changes
Date Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:47:39 GMT
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 05:38PM, Prachi Garg wrote:
> I've created Google site verification for both, http and https version of
> Ignite website. I've also added sitemap.xml and robots.txt.
> 
> If I may, I would like to suggest a server-side 301 redirect from http to
> https version of the website to ensure that users and search engines are
> directed to the preferred protocol (I'm guessing https pages are preferred
> over http pages).

That's a good idea! I guess not everyone just installs HttpsEverywhere and
forget that the websites still handle non-secure transport ;)

Cos

> Thanks,
> 
> -Prachi
> 
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Raul Kripalani <raul@evosent.com> wrote:
> 
> > robots.txt is not functionally important in this context because we don't
> > have content we want to exclude from crawling.
> >
> > But it's always wise to serve at least a generic one because you don't know
> > if Google penalises sites that return an HTTP 404 for this file in terms of
> > SEO. I wouldn't be surprised if it did. And it's a simple file to add.
> >
> > Moreover, I would suggest creating a google-site-verification with a
> > sitemap controlled by us (if it hasn't been done yet - I'm on mobile now
> > and it's a pain to check). And also to hint the crawler to also crawl
> > readme.io and the javadoc. Currently if I google the term IgniteContext I
> > get the 1.1.0 javadoc page, which tells me that Google needs some hints to
> > crawl more recent javadocs better.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raúl.
> > On 2 Sep 2015 00:36, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" <dsetrakyan@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Raul,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the late reply, but better late than never :)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Raul Kripalani <raulk@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > wget spider output here:
> > > > https://gist.github.com/raulk/7d6713aa7b3d21ecaacd
> > > >
> > > > No issues with regards to the domain migration, but we have 404 in
> > > > robots.txt and some jquery JS across many pages.
> > > >
> > > > I also ran a spider on our readme.io docs, and it was quite OK except
> > > that
> > > > it found these 404s:
> > > >
> > > > --2015-08-24 12:16:43--
> > > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/distributed-closures%22  HTTP/1.1
> > > 404
> > > > Not Found
> > > > --2015-08-24 12:26:04--
> > > >
> > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/%7B%7Burl('v'%20+%20v.version)%7D%7D
> > > >  HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Raul, is there a way to find out the referrer pages that have these
> > links?
> > >
> > >
> > > > With regards to the jquery URL references:
> > > >
> > > > --2015-08-24 12:19:31--
> > > > http://ignite.apache.org/use-cases/spark/js/jquery-1.11.1.min.js
> > > >   HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
> > > > --2015-08-24 12:19:27--
> > > > http://ignite.apache.org/use-cases/caching/js/jquery-1.11.1.min.js
> > > >   HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
> > > >
> > >
> > > Prachi, any chance you can look at these?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Are some examples. I guess these HTMLs are referring to jquery in the
> > > > context directory rather than in a common directory.
> > > >
> > > > Do you think it makes sense to add a robots.txt for SEO purposes?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Raul, I am not sure what we would put into robots.txt. Is there any
> > benefit
> > > in having this file vs not having it?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> > > > Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
> > > > Integration specialist
> > > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> > > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> > > dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Igniters,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have updated the Ignite website to reflect the project graduation
> > > > (turned
> > > > > out that many links were not working).
> > > > >
> > > > > Would be nice if the community clicked around and verified that all
> > the
> > > > > links are working and all the wording and examples are correct.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > D.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >

Mime
View raw message