Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B537018669 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46899 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2015 10:42:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 46860 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2015 10:42:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 46849 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2015 10:42:41 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:42:41 +0000 Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id CBEC91A0361 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagz9 with SMTP id z9so96567464lag.3 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 03:42:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlDZCeSr9fiyOgdh6vpEfJQoUuoTOqhhY3lhtvFBYBD+O2n5pUK0AZ2Ex0LiFrvpDflzUxe MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.25.69 with SMTP id a5mr5594515lbg.16.1439894559418; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 03:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.221.38 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 03:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:42:39 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Deprecate IgniteConfiguration.getGridName From: Yakov Zhdanov To: dev@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3f5beba8713051d939398 --001a11c3f5beba8713051d939398 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Guys, I am thinking of deprecating this property. 1. nodes with different grid names can discover each other and build a single topology. I heard that some of the users expected that there would be separate topologies 2. Locally started nodes can be accessed via their IDs through Ignition interface. 3. Internally gridName is used in components serialization and deserializaiton, but this is very unreliable and can be broken if different names are configured within the same topology - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10 Thoughts? --Yakov --001a11c3f5beba8713051d939398--