Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:40:51 -0700
From: Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.2.0 release (RC2)
Message-ID: <20150701184051.GF28615@boudnik.org>
Mail-Followup-To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org
References: 
 <CAGcMBHi99_DpEFavKbLVPgS-cTGMyWExzDJQTF1Sx1ZbPk9SgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <558CF238.2040302@apache.org>
 <CAGcMBHgCK6V=N0Muagvvf0BcCxQ=rAhbEjfn9UQjsqzuuSWUKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <55917DE5.5060905@apache.org>
 <20150630172403.GN28615@boudnik.org>
 <CAOKDqC9Pu6nmFZ_CgfNg1BTPHS_BLLzWcyq3hRz7-2RXf2F3yQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOKDqC_Sx7HXBdsV8h0EGqsATVY2666xN_cKaQAi2fHYOQCPCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+0=VoUky6V2nu-QO2jSS7F5oKrN2kMWef0jxFtUfHC1TQ_jgA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+0=VoUky6V2nu-QO2jSS7F5oKrN2kMWef0jxFtUfHC1TQ_jgA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:44AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> GridGain community edition is not governed by Apache should have LGPL
> turned on.
> 
> The LGPL profile in Maven should be turned on by default because our users
> should build with LGPL libraries included. However, the Apache Ignite
> binary release should have LGPL turned off, as users can download it

There's no such thing as Apache binary release: ASF releases only source code.

Cos

> directly from the Apache Ignite website directly.
> 
> D.
> 
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogradov@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Also,
> > Currently lgpl profile is turned on during Ignite Fabric Release build and
> > as a result distribution contain lgpl artifacts.
> > Should we build Igrite releases without lgpl profile in future?
> >
> > Is it legal to build GridGain Community Edition with lgpl profile turned
> > on?
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogradov@gridgain.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > As Justin said we have dependency on javax.servlet-api-3.0.1 (CDDL +
> > > GPLv2). As far as I understang we can not ptovide this artifact as a part
> > > of Ignite binary distribution.
> > > But I found that Apache Tomcat have same (javax.servlet.*) classes under
> > > Apache licence (for example -
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/trunk/java/javax/servlet/AsyncContext.java
> > > ).
> > > Is there any chances to use these classes at Ignite?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> We have a nighly build going on builds.apache.org. It should be easy to
> > >> add
> > >> one to do the release's convenience binaries there as well. Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> Cos
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 07:18PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > >> > On 26.06.2015 14:52, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> > >> > > Brane, mvn clean package does this. The process is covered in
> > >> DEVNOTES.txt
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Is that what you ask about?
> > >> >
> > >> > No, I'm asking where (on which machine) this is done. Ideally, these
> > >> > convenience binaries should be build on controlled ASF infrastructure,
> > >> > not on some random (possibly infected) developer's laptop.
> > >> >
> > >> > -- Brane
> > >> >
> > >> > > 2015-06-26 9:33 GMT+03:00 Branko Čibej <brane@apache.org>:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> On 22.06.2015 12:20, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> > >> > >>> Guys,
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> ignite-1.2.0-incubating-rc2 has been accepted with 7 votes (2
> > >> binding).
> > >> > >>> Thanks to those who voted:
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>    - Gianfranco
> > >> > >>>    - Sergi
> > >> > >>>    - Branko (binding)
> > >> > >>>    - Alexey Goncharuk
> > >> > >>>    - Valentin
> > >> > >>>    - Semyon
> > >> > >>>    - Konstantin Boudnik (binding)
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> I will start vote on general list shortly.
> > >> > >> By the way, and before we get hammered about this on general@:
> > >> Where are
> > >> > >> the 'convenience binaries' for Ignite releases being built? Even if
> > >> > >> they're not official, they should be built on controlled hardware
> > and
> > >> > >> the release process doc should contain instructions for building
> > >> them.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> -- Brane
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >