ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Atri Sharma <atri.j...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.3.0 Release (RC2)
Date Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:42:08 GMT
Out of curiosity, are we only using MD5 and SHA1 for checksums?

If that is the case, can we try CRC? Much easier to port and easier to
compute


On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
wrote:

> I think we should just stop using MD5 Hash and just keep using SHA1. In my
> experience, the MD5 format is different on different operating systems,
> while the SHA1 works the same in most of the cases.
>
> D.
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhdanov@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I'll take a look. Thanks, Brane!
> >
> > --Yakov
> >
> > 2015-07-13 11:27 GMT+03:00 Branko ─îibej <brane@apache.org>:
> >
> > > On 12.07.2015 08:18, Branko ─îibej wrote:
> > > > On 11.07.2015 02:00, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > > >> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 01:56AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> > > >>> Dear Sirs!
> > > >> If you're trying to please IPMC gramma-busybodies with this - don't
> > > bother:
> > > >> they will find a reason why that isn't an appropriate way to address
> > > them ;)
> > > > I'm more interested in why 1.3.0-rc1 is still in dist/dev. You should
> > > > really immediately delete packages that aren't candidates for
> release,
> > > > anything else just creates confusion.
> > >
> > > Sigh. The SHA1 and MD5 file format is still wrong. Please either look
> it
> > > up if you're faking the format, or use the correct tools to generate
> it.
> > >
> > > Specifically, there should be two spaces between the hash and the file
> > > name.
> > >
> > > -- Brane
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Regards,

Atri
*l'apprenant*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message