ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Ceph w/ Ignite
Date Thu, 09 Jul 2015 08:53:36 GMT
Hm... I would think that file system would be more beneficial, although
object store on disk can also be valuable.

Cos, what is your thinking?

D.

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:40 PM, RJ Nowling <rnowling@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ceph makes a better object store while Gluster makes a better file system.
>   That's why Ceph is a popular backend for OpenStack Swift.
>
> Does Ignite want a FS or Object backend?
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Good point... although I was curious about Ignite's take on that first
> and
> > foremost. Yet, cross-posting to dev@bigtop.a.o
> >
> > Jay et all: any thoughts about the combination?
> >   Cos
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 03:14PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > > I'm sure our RH brethren have something to say about Ceph.
> > > Re-post on dev@bigtop?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Roman.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > Guys,
> > > >
> > > > I was looking at the Hadoop accelerator the other day and been
> > thinking if
> > > > anyone has tried to use IGFS on top of a real distributed file
> > storage. The
> > > > case in point is Ceph (ceph.com) - a Linux file system available
> from
> > any
> > > > major Linux distribution as a kernel module.
> > > >
> > > > HDFS has its share in the world, but it isn't the fastest, simplest,
> > nor most
> > > > advantageous distributed storage on the planet. Hence I am wondering
> > if this
> > > > would be a good call to provide Ignite on CEPH as a 2nd FS
> > capabilities.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >   Cos
> > > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message