ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Boudnik <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Jira Process
Date Tue, 28 Jul 2015 18:11:37 GMT
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 06:23AM, Vasilisa Sidorova wrote:
> In a perfect world I agree with Brane. 
> But there is top class from each igniter to trust each others on the 1000%
> and always to be ready that something go sideways. This process take time. 

Actually, no one is talking about 100% trust. That's why post-commit reviews
are welcome, and reverts aren't removed from the table as a faculty of last

We are talking about trusting a committer not to do silly things that break
the master. People will be making mistakes anyway; reviewers are people too
and will be making mistakes as well. There's no way to stop it: but there're
ways to mitigate the harm and to make sure bad commits are few and far apart.


> So I think that our Jira process should be flexible because Ignite is young
> project.
> As a first step we can get together to commit simple fixes without review
> and take as a "simple" issues in Jira with "trivial" priority.
> When our community credit of trust will grows up we can review Jira process
> and decide to take as a "simple" issues in Jira with "minor" priority or
> find some new solution.
> Etc...
> Regards,
> Vasilisa
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Jira-Process-tp1816p1917.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

View raw message