Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC51618200 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 14:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85305 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2015 14:16:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 85264 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2015 14:16:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85253 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2015 14:16:11 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Jun 2015 14:16:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 31621CC2B3 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 14:16:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.97 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.97 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dBMyf_i8GGix for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 14:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with SMTP id 6F44921544 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 14:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85244 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2015 14:16:02 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Jun 2015 14:16:02 +0000 Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com (mail-oi0-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 855281A035C for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 14:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oigz2 with SMTP id z2so15842279oig.1 for ; Sun, 07 Jun 2015 07:16:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkGM3JDACUK85mAbDAUS+w4h0czHqY+nHoz0h88w8i6WCiDRtNplLJs4Xe3j/Gg8rQUja+z X-Received: by 10.60.15.133 with SMTP id x5mr10658829oec.80.1433686561757; Sun, 07 Jun 2015 07:16:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.190.70 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 07:15:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <557450BC.8030704@apache.org> References: <557450BC.8030704@apache.org> From: Dmitriy Setrakyan Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 17:15:21 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Improve Ignite GIT Process To: "dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e014945c03bb0d70517ee2ad7 --089e014945c03bb0d70517ee2ad7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How do we reach consensus without a vote? I thought vote will encourage everyone to participate and provide opinion. I can cancel the vote, but so far I have heard no objections to the newly proposed structure. Does it mean we have a consensus? D. On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Branko =C4=8Cibej wrote: > On 07.06.2015 15:50, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > Let's have a vote on the GIT structure proposed by the community (mainl= y > > Brane and Cos). > > Stop right there. Voting makes no sense at all. Discuss and reach > consensus instead. > > Voting should never be used as a decision-making tool; it's an > indication that the community can't agree on anything and resorts to > majority rule instead of consensus rule. > > -- Brane > > --089e014945c03bb0d70517ee2ad7--