ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Improve Ignite GIT Process
Date Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:39:41 GMT
I tend to agree with Valentin. This is a change that will affect the whole
project, and one of the cases where voting makes sense in my view.

D.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually this silence is my main concern here :)
>
> We're going the change the process. And everyone in the community has to
> move to the new process at the same time. I have nothing against consensus
> concept, but IMHO there should be some formal indicator. Such a vote (if we
> do not apply majority rules to it) can be one of them - when the vote is
> closed, decision is made. Are there other options?
>
> -Val
> On Jun 11, 2015 12:03 AM, "Branko Čibej" <brane@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On 11.06.2015 01:47, Valentin Kulichenko wrote:
> > > Hmm. I'm not sure I understand. As far as I understand, any vote here
> > > is unanimous, but not majority. I.e., if anyone in community has
> > > objections, vote is declined (already not a democracy, right? :) ). If
> > so,
> > > I really don't see any difference between "consensus is recorded by no
> > > objections
> > > being raised" and "consensus is recorded by the vote being passed".
> >
> > See again re "silent consensus". It's an informal process. Voting is
> > formal and by definition implies that the majority rules. Consensus
> > implies something else entirely. A -1 vote can be overridden by others.
> > An objection during silent consensus process cannot.
> >
> > -- Brane
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message