Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 markojevtic@gmail.com does not designate 54.191.145.13 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Subject: Re: Making Ignite In-Memory File System mountable
From: Marko Jevtic <markojevtic@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+0=VoV=9nFOrhJUQBzJcmfqExrad9P--s+60qbLMjRbs9wToA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 04:08:12 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E76721FD-50A0-49E1-8181-C40C36946181@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+0=VoV=9nFOrhJUQBzJcmfqExrad9P--s+60qbLMjRbs9wToA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org

Sorry for dropping like this in the topic :)

But I think it would be extremely useful if we Ignite would provide an =
API to virtually expose structures in cache.
Like computing on fly (on access) csv/excel files or pdf reports from =
cache, besides the regular usage to access Ignite=E2=80=99s file system.

Just an idea.

> On May 5, 2015, at 3:58 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org> =
wrote:
>=20
> I have noticed a Jira filed to make IGFS mountable:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-854
>=20
> The integration proposed is via Fuse framework which would allow us =
mount
> IGFS just like a regular Linux file system.
>=20
> This seems like a pretty big undertaking. Even though it sounds pretty =
cool
> in theory, it would be interesting to find out form the community if
> everyone else finds it useful and maybe suggest some potential use =
cases
> for it.
>=20
> Also, seems like Fuse framework is not being actively developed. Last
> release came out in July, 2013. How safe is it to use this framework?
>=20
> D.