Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEE2E18B4D for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79170 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2015 07:28:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 79130 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2015 07:28:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88614 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2015 07:01:30 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:01:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AFD3B1A3715 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:01:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.98 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.98 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lXgf-PQpQrGs for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com (mail-qc0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0AA7820C38 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcir1 with SMTP id r1so19050310qci.3 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 00:01:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CnlZn0NCD4SuAu4EwOTAasu1QX9RGklfqcjGzfZvRxE=; b=RyP/WQZ0QRQF4khWRwxwLKbNwDHhWH+1wE+87yzjrxqZkE9V6hKWn5rk2y5cADV36M fmyq9jccPrDjaZq8+HWdm5iHw+tRWK2TfJ350H8JLXwFQybb+aRIFvxD6s769m4O5rC8 sGHgdj3RXD94wNB69H6lSj7UZZ08oOI9eR5I0x+dBP/n0gx50QmhSRUhuum5Emu7K4uy VxWAmP1CIDkvCEcay13N+spIg7L395IPMHuARj3wPHK2Hr+Ur9jDJNjaOtBWax6flK+X gf9dmZ7q4XVALQzEIsEmE5bIgnIqM14GEBSF+3T+ZeQfqyi9AnVo8CbGIhS2WGK3oNFz 7Ztw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlIjn77IxjaD7i/KB3xC0yifitoiXG9doyABsgG0b5MedP7ox6ZKVQQlIL31zWpNacunMa+ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.15.129 with SMTP id 1mr69077558qkp.29.1432105281886; Wed, 20 May 2015 00:01:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.16.97 with HTTP; Wed, 20 May 2015 00:01:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:01:21 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Choosing C++ version for interop. From: Vladimir Ozerov To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1146f1009ba5e805167dfe7a --001a1146f1009ba5e805167dfe7a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 C++11 users can use C++03 projects, but not vice-versa. On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Vladimir Ozerov > wrote: > > > Igniters, > > > > We need to decide which C++ version to use in interop. Currently wide > > developer community is in progress of adopting C++11. But if we choose > it, > > users might have problems if their CPP projects using older C++ revisions > > which are still very common. > > > > I think we should stick to C++03 revision for now. Thoughts? > > > > If we stick to this version, what are the consequences for users who run > C++ 11? > > > > > > Vladimir. > > > --001a1146f1009ba5e805167dfe7a--