Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B3DF17665 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 02:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46971 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2015 02:39:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 46927 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2015 02:39:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 46916 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2015 02:39:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2015 02:39:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [54.191.145.13] (HELO mx1-us-west.apache.org) (54.191.145.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2015 02:39:51 +0000 Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with SMTP id 7ABE920514 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 02:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45584 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2015 02:38:16 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2015 02:38:16 +0000 Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com (mail-ob0-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id D44A91A03BB for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 02:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obfe9 with SMTP id e9so120349246obf.1 for ; Mon, 04 May 2015 19:38:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkwYmFXFDkfE2dtkwAyDyYeQdz/77uv1k/7L4guxjAKOl+pMBcLeqNSprgIvuP6vlOIjH3U X-Received: by 10.182.213.227 with SMTP id nv3mr20336268obc.10.1430793495161; Mon, 04 May 2015 19:38:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.190.70 with HTTP; Mon, 4 May 2015 19:37:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7E0514CB-FA89-4037-BE13-539DDBB13002@gmail.com> References: <7E0514CB-FA89-4037-BE13-539DDBB13002@gmail.com> From: Dmitriy Setrakyan Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 19:37:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OpenCL To: "dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c303a606c69b05154c92ad X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c303a606c69b05154c92ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Marko Jevtic wrote: > Are there any current ideas about adding OpenCL to Ignite framework ? Like > enhancing current computations with ability to execute on GPU if applicable? > > I could be wrong, but I thought that OpenCL was all about parallel local processing across multiple cores and CPUs. Do you think there is a use case for distributing computations there? If yes, wouldn't users just use JOCL ( http://www.jocl.org/) to interact with OpenCL jobs from Ignite jobs? Or do you think additional integration is possible here? --001a11c303a606c69b05154c92ad--