ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite
Date Fri, 08 May 2015 09:17:39 GMT
Prashant,

Yes, queries support is on the implementation roadmap. However, there is a
chance that implementation of advanced features (like filters in SCAN
queries, and continuous queries) will be postponed a bit.

Vladimir.

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhdanov@apache.org> wrote:

> Prashant, we are trying to achieve API parity. Of course, some limitations
> will take place, but cache operations + queries will be supported.
>
> Vladimir Ozerov, can you please reply to this thread with issue number, so
> everyone can get updates on the progress?
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2015-05-08 12:01 GMT+03:00 Prashant Singh Thakur <
> prashant.thakur@subex.com>
> :
>
> > Hi Yakov,
> >
> > We have Linux based application who would be using this.
> > 2 months will be OK for us let us know if require any help.
> > We are looking for APIs especially for Query part will that be available
> > of it would be normal Cache APIs like get, put.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Prashant Thakur
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yakov Zhdanov [mailto:yzhdanov@apache.org]
> > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 2:13 PM
> > To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite
> >
> > Prashant,
> >
> > Ignite currently Ignite does not have C++ API - we are currently working
> > on this and this will be ready within 2 months or so.
> >
> > If you are on Windows you can use .Net APIs available in Enterprise
> > edition. Will this work for you?
> >
> > --Yakov
> >
> > 2015-05-08 9:01 GMT+03:00 Prashant Singh Thakur <
> prashant.thakur@subex.com
> > >:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Do we have a C++ client for interacting with Ignite and if yes what
> > > all operations are supported ?
> > >
> > > We are looking for some alternative to Infinispan as not able to scale
> > > to 100G per node hence exploring this as an alternative.
> > >
> > > The major use cases at present would be to interact with cache with
> > > Queries If that's there we would like to benchmark the same for our
> > > use cases.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Prashant Thakur
> > >
> > > Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described
> > > at http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
> > >
> > Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described at
> > http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message