ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Two different Ignite-Versions?
Date Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:23:41 GMT
On 29.04.2015 23:13, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Branko ─îibej <brane@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 29.04.2015 18:42, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Markus Wiesenbacher <
>>> mailinglist@codefreun.de> wrote:
>>>> You write on your site that GridGain Community Edition powered by Apache
>>>> Ignite will have additional bug fixes ... will this version be free? Why
>>>> another version and why not bringing those fixes into the general
>> Ignite?
>>> Community Edition is free and all the fixes in community edition will be
>>> available in Apache Ignite. The benefit of the community edition is that
>> it
>>> can be released more often than the official Apache Ignite release
>> endorsed
>>> by ASF, so the community can get the bug fixes faster.
>> I'm having real trouble understanding this argument. Any bugs would
>> first be fixed in Ignite code, yes? Ignite can have an official release
>> every hour if you guys are prepared to spend time on that. :)
> All bugs are fixed in Ignite first, of course. GridGain community edition
> just takes the sprint branch of Ignite and can produce a release at any
> point, if there are important bug fixes there.  Official ASF release, as we
> all know, can take up to 2 weeks for voting and, if there are any
> rejections, even longer. There are also many other factors that may delay
> the official Apache release.
> The only motivation for the community edition is to provide the Ignite user
> base with bug fixes much sooner than within 2 weeks.

You're assuming that Ignite will be an incubating podling forever. Is
that a self-fulfilling prophecy? :D

-- Brane

View raw message