Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of henry.saputra@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+0=VoUT8nyBVUegGfKtnW450pUNmO7bdkJhq__seg-1CrVHmg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54FEAEE6.8040706@apache.org>
	<54FEB0C1.3020601@apache.org>
	<CA+0=VoUYQuL83vW9wfBdDBaDzQwEWtxzjm-MyoX1+gfLbqg2aQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<54FFC65E.7000507@apache.org>
	<CA+0=VoVSiYuvg+XYsxNCOKC9OJKceUD692CXH36meVRBigiLJg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+0=VoVuiZhJ-Nd3N1w1tu0_8jDF2rr22gpkTzd9_J0cbEOttQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+0=VoUT8nyBVUegGfKtnW450pUNmO7bdkJhq__seg-1CrVHmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:18:56 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CALuGr6bKtOT71_D0pKKTZy8W1WJGOuTwSpu3GE7OaKALctE4ag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Downloads on the web site
From: Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
To: "dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org" <dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11332538177ecb05110ed8a3

--001a11332538177ecb05110ed8a3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Good news, thanks for the update

On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
wrote:

> Never mind, I found the answer that GPL with CPE is not allowed.
>
> However, all classes under "org.apache.ignite.jdk8.backport" package have
> also been released by Doug Lee to the public domain under "CC0 1.0
> Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication" with the following language=
:
> ----
> *Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166*
> *Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at*
> *http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
> <http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/>*
> ----
>
> I think we are OK. I will update the Notice file.
>
> D.
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> dsetrakyan@gridgain.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > I have a question. We actually do have some back-ported code from OpenJ=
dk
> > 8 which is licensed under GPL with CPE (Class Path Exception). Is it OK
> to
> > have a dependency on GPL w/ CPE in the source code or do we have to
> remove
> > it from the source code?
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> dsetrakyan@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Brane, let me review the docs and get back to you.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Branko =C4=8Cibej <brane@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 10.03.2015 22:17, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> >>> > Brane,
> >>> >
> >>> > The RC1 was a legitimate Ignite release candidate as it was submitt=
ed
> >>> for a
> >>> > vote. Please let us know if there are certain documented guidelines
> >>> here
> >>> > that we are not aware of.
> >>>
> >>> It's all documented here:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> >>>
> >>> Specifically, this is written *in bold* on that page:
> >>>
> >>>     Do not include any links on the project website that might
> encourage
> >>>     non-developers to download and use nightly builds, snapshots,
> >>>     release candidates, or any other similar package.
> >>>
> >>> It is fine to call a specific package a "release candidate" and even
> >>> publish is as an ASF release under that name, but in the case of
> >>> Ignite's RC1 and RC2, these are /not/ official releases because they
> >>> have not been approved as such by the PPMC and IPMC.
> >>>
> >>> > Moreover, this RC1 zip archive provides users with the ability to
> kick
> >>> the
> >>> > tires with Apache Ignite ahead of time, before the official 1.0
> >>> release is
> >>> > out. I am not sure how removing it serves either community or user
> >>> base of
> >>> > the Ignite project.
> >>>
> >>> Then tell people how to fetch a tag or specific commit from the git
> >>> repository, or simply how to clone a read-only (possibly shallow) cop=
y.
> >>> It definitely doesn't serve the Ignite community or user base to post
> >>> confusing links to the web site.//
> >>>
> >>> > As a side note, we already have addressed all RC2 issues and are a
> >>> couple
> >>> > of days away from sending out RC3 for a vote, which will most likel=
y
> >>> become
> >>> > an official Apache Ignite 1.0 release. It will be easier to just
> >>> switch one
> >>> > zip archive with another when that happens.
> >>>
> >>> You must realize that our release policy is not arbitrary and is driv=
en
> >>> by legal requirements. Even if RC3 is perfect, it will take at least =
a
> >>> week to approve (vote on dev@ must run at least 72 hours, and the sam=
e
> >>> again for the IPMC vote), so that's an extra week of confusing users
> and
> >>> violating ASF policies. Please remove the download link because I
> really
> >>> don't want to do that myself.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> While we're on the topic of RC3, I've been trying to send my comments
> on
> >>> RC2 twice to this list in the last couple days, but apparently they
> >>> haven't come through ... I'll try again, hope for the best.
> >>>
> >>> -- Brane
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

--001a11332538177ecb05110ed8a3--