Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3937817682 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82285 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2015 23:54:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 82249 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2015 23:54:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82238 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2015 23:54:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:54:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.3] (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:54:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 81609 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2015 23:54:14 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:54:14 +0000 Received: from zulu.23.e-reka.si (cpe-46-164-24-12.dynamic.amis.net [46.164.24.12]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 33D791A012D for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5519E222.6030801@apache.org> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 01:54:10 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= Organization: The Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.0.0 release References: <20150330182052.GI1657@boudnik.org> <20150330211731.GL1657@boudnik.org> <20150330225429.GU1657@boudnik.org> In-Reply-To: <20150330225429.GU1657@boudnik.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAADBQTFRF IhsbCy0qZjoVOVRoeFxSAIKBzXQiAKaibYiewnk7nn9z0qCTgL3i87Ep6Kx/+tHBsrE+zgAAAjZJ REFUOMvF0jFoE1EYB/CzjWlqIzaTjqVIBifRRWyG0t5iUqlLyFpCeXBgKg5yq6A4degUDJjoUDpc 1Qt4Ux94B11SOLB0KGS4discpbkORTCn9/m9d3fvLhXnvuHu3f+Xx/veyyfZfLSdZHzgicSfeyw4 JISwdz8FT6M8lM8Ceg385Dlhs+cC9sQCDn0B78QCogzwN+sxfHGOIXBbRGkNAM4cZymGtgNsDPgz cByxon3EEm1TLmvAlghoHOO3CZSa+IQ/vF6JV8tgKOMow78gRgL2/+EIvATOUtB3SSdMg4GXgrbn uk0uLiGdoCHKbX4E+t1FUTqn1AtIdPJebssDQ64YANSQyyaQNyUOFs0ijMsMFnOPTahPLXKYowtY 08MfCP7vR7hRnc5zmPK7CDYYbHcbC7tHuyFA94U/1LYZaJpu/sxACHMwvwZljTLY0TbNk4x+zuEt yC3MfCM6uSIvfwur0itFL4FA2Yal8BzLfnYV4EIGwEPAk7o5zIcnvzHMEjwJrrhAKK7on6IrsfRJ 7A53BhaK+CL7fj6+q/sPeOvcDTtoZTxpUYsFeIknrOXep3p3l7Ua+8sZ5FPQKyKwWi+DfROTU7ny C1/9UhpeY7K287WJCzbsNPQm2S6Yk4PSCNhWM2r3nD0K9liYb6yPgCRJhSzPrxUK0yUBVk1VX0lj s7MzGZyp0wImMK/e8rHbz2soL+O+2r1dxfGsAmBcx0lNjS/RUhlUC7gRn1wGMdQ7Vw1/AReW/RN3 xFWdAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000707000204050604090201" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------000707000204050604090201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 31.03.2015 00:54, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:39PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:54PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: >>>> Cos, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the vote! I think the whole PPMC voted as well. >>> I think 3 ppl from PPMC have voted, which is not "the whole PPMC" but >>> enough >>> to start the vote on general@incubator.a.o >>> >> I counted Yakov, Valentin, Semyon, Serj, and Vladimir have voted, so seems >> like 5 PPMC votes and 1 from IPMC (Cos). > Sorry, I missed two as a part of this thread has been already moved to a > different folder. You're right of course. Even so, there are 17 PPMC members, 14 of these are not mentors, according to http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ignite.html and I think 14 > 5 so it's indeed not "the whole PPMC". :) +1 for release but the following problems should be fixed for the next release: 1. After building with ... and running bin/ignite.sh I get the following message: Ignite ver. 1.0.0#19700101-sha1:n/a There are two problems here: * The date is wrong * There's not commit ID and/or tag name IMO, the source package should be generated by a script that: * creates a tag in the repository; * exports the contents of the tagged tree * updates the exported tree: o sets the current date (and time?) for version display o sets the tag name for same The point is that the user should be able to take the source package and produce release-grade binaries with all the version references (dates, commit IDs, etc); and the convenience binaries should be built from the source package, not from a Git checkout. 2. Please stop calling the project "Apache Ignite In-Memory Data Fabric". It's called just "Apache Ignite". Needs changes in: * DEVNOTES.txt * README.txt * RELEASE_NOTES.txt * pom.xml 3. The name of the build binary package should be similar to the name of the source package. Right now we start with incubator-ignite-1.0.0-src.zip and produce ignite-fabric-1.0.0.zip (note the "fabric" popping up again) Instead, the build should produce incubator-ignite-1.0.0.zip Since there's currently only one edition, I recommend to stop using the ${ignite.edition} property in pom.xml. If, at some point, you want to produce different binary editions from the source package, I suggest the naming scheme should be incubator-igite-1.0.0-${edition}.zip FWIW, it's fine to change "incubator-ignite-" to "apache-ignite-". -- Brane --------------000707000204050604090201--