Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 01:01:30 +0000
From: Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: maven builds
Message-ID: <20150313010130.GQ1657@boudnik.org>
References: 
 <CA+0=VoVNwNu9FZS5AseiDdrJbP1jONUsTONc7aR43HAU8_jNeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150313002342.GP1657@boudnik.org>
 <CA+0=VoU=ynKeTqRct+a7VQ5j_FHwv81zkC-c5uekNh2Ei5Kdaw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+0=VoU=ynKeTqRct+a7VQ5j_FHwv81zkC-c5uekNh2Ei5Kdaw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Ah, I see. Yes, I think a better way to go from a pure Maven perspective is to
bind this sort of generation to assembly step perhaps. Cause 'package' is
expected to produce jar files. What you do with them afterwards - isn't a
'package' business, IMO.


On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:36PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> It is OK for "mvn package" to generate JAR files. However, in case of
> Ignite, it also generates the release binary ZIP archive which actually
> requires that you are in the root of a valid Ignite GIT tree. I would
> rather have the release ZIP file generated with an additional option added
> to the "mvn" command.
> 
> D.
> 
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > I think package is by default bound to the binary generation, so it
> > would'be
> > pretty messy if you'll try to break this dependency.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:38PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > Based on the latest feedback from the mentors, I think we need to make
> > sure
> > > that standard "mvn clean package -DskipTests" command can run
> > successfully
> > > by default. This means that that this command should not generate a
> > binary
> > > build by default.
> > >
> > > It is OK to add extra parameters when doing the binary build though.
> > >
> > > How hard would it be to implement this change?
> > >
> > > D.
> >