ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.0.0 release
Date Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:54:48 GMT
Cos,

Thanks for the vote! I think the whole PPMC voted as well.

Brane, would love to get your vote too.

As far as the error you got, I cannot reproduce it. Is there anyone else in
the community who tried this?

D.



On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Checksums are ok
> Signature is ok
> Release tree produces binaries without optional LGPL libs
>
> Have filed for the following bug (doesn't appear to be a blocker?)
>      IGNITE-650. ignitevisorcmd fails with NoClassDefFoundError
>
> Cos
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 06:40PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > (restarting a new vote for 1.0.0 after fixing the default build not to
> > include LGPL libs)
> >
> > I have uploaded the new 1.0.0 release candidate to:
> >   http://people.apache.org/~dsetrakyan/incubator-ignite-1.0.0/
> >
> > The following changes were made based on all the feedback I got for RC3:
> >
> > 1. Added the ability to build a binary ZIP file without LGPL dependencies
> > by default.
> > 2. Fixed jdk8.backport wrong license issue.
> > 3. Fixed NOTICE.txt according to comments from IPMC.
> > 4. Fixed LICENSE.txt according to comments from IPMC.
> >
> > To build a binary release from source run:
> >
> >     # Without LGPL dependencies
> >     mvn clean package -DskipTests
> >
> >     # With LGPL dependencies
> >     mvn clean package -DskipTests -Prelease,lgpl
> >
> >
> > Instructions on how to run RAT and how to build the project are available
> > in DEVNOTES.txt file.
> >
> > Please start voting.
> >
> > +1 - to accept Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0.0
> > 0 - don't care either way
> > -1 - DO NOT accept Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0.0 (explain why)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message