ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Boudnik <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.0.0 RC3 release
Date Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:14:26 GMT
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 07:55AM, Branko ─îibej wrote:
> On 13.03.2015 04:42, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > Checksums are ok
> > Signature is ok
> > rat report looks good
> > sha1sum file looks good, but md5sum still has a weird format. At least now
> > it is easy to validate, so issue for me.
> >
> > -1 however (sorry) because
> >
> > - top level directory is called incubator-ignite-ce2230b, should be
> >   incubator-ignite-1.0, I believe. Also, it'd make sense to name the archive
> >   and sum files in the same fashion. This way, once the RC is accepted to the
> >   release all you need to do is to rename the directory but the file names
> >   will remain the same.
> 
> On this point: there's really no reason to put -RC3 in the actual
> package name or the unzipped directory name if you intend to release
> without the release-candidate tag. Just call it
> ignite-incubating-1.0.0.zip (and .zip.asc and .zip.sha1, etc.). Once a
> release vote passes, the *only* thing that should happen to the files is
> them being copied to the dist/release repository; no renaming.

I believe this is what I said. By directory I meant the one where the files
are published. Sorry, if my explanation was convoluted - dealing with some
.... @work tonight ;(

> It's not as if anyone is likely to be confused by the lack of the -RC?
> tag, because no-one except developers should see the package until it is
> released. (This ties in with the publishing rules, fwiw.)
> 
> Alternatively, as I said elsewhere, you can release something as a
> release candidate, but you have to establish what exactly that means for
> users in terms of API and ABI compatibility with a "real" release.
> 
> > Otherwise, if you rename the diretory inside of the archive, you'll get the
> > wrong checksums and would need to redo the Vote technically.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:14PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> >> I have uploaded the new RC3 release candidate to:
> >>   http://people.apache.org/~dsetrakyan/ignite-1.0.0-RC3
> >>
> >> The following changes were made based on all the feedback I got for RC2:
> >>
> >> 1. Added DISCLAIMER.txt
> >> 2. Added DEVNOTES.txt
> >> 3. Updated NOTICE.txt with section about "org.jdk8.backport" package
> >> released to public domain under creative commons.
> >> 4. Removed "licenses" folder
> >>
> >> Instructions on how to run RAT and how to build the project are available
> >> in DEVNOTES.txt file.
> >>
> >> Please start voting.
> >>
> >> +1 - to accept the RC2 as Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0
> >> 0 - don't care either way
> >> -1 - DO NOT accept RC2 as Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 (explain why)
> 

Mime
View raw message