ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: IgniteFS -> IFS
Date Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:14:30 GMT
So, what are our votes?
1) Do not rename
2) Rename to IFS in sprint-1
3) Rename to IFS in further sprints.

If we are OK with "ÏFS" abbreviation I vote for renaming right now because
renaming in further sprints will yield in backward compatibility issues
(e.g. in XML configs).

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> I think it is OK.
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > JFYI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Installable_File_System
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhdanov@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Yakov Zhdanov, Director R&D
> > > *GridGain Systems*
> > > www.gridgain.com
> > >
> > > 2015-02-12 7:21 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > For whatever reason when I was renaming the file system, I named it
> > > > IgniteFs. Now I keep hearing that everyone is calling it IFS ("I" for
> > > > Ignite), and it does sound like a better name.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have any objections about calling it IFS? If no, we will
> > > have
> > > > to rename IgniteFileSystem to IfsFileSystem (and other classes
> > > > accordingly).
> > > >
> > > > D.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergey Kozlov
> > GridGain Systems
> > www.gridgain.com
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message