Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C91E4109AE for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 03:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44756 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2014 03:54:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ignite-dev-archive@ignite.apache.org Received: (qmail 44724 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2014 03:54:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ignite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44712 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2014 03:54:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 03:54:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [96.114.154.165] (HELO resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.165) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 03:54:03 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.231]) by resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ATu11p0014zp9eg01Tu1Sv; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 03:54:01 +0000 Received: from tpx ([24.130.135.131]) by resomta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ATu01p0082qGB6001Tu0nl; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 03:54:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tpx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA21204A9FE2 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 20:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 20:54:00 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: dev@ignite.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo Message-ID: <20141102035400.GD14932@tpx> References: <20141031195151.GC3363@tcos> <54557344.3070200@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b6+NkB2aXYhLTocY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54557344.3070200@apache.org> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1414900441; bh=gnXPpSge3fg/F7qOIsXXKBUW0MCOPugUxALwqLstMXk=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CUsKZiWK6gTMLTCyvaBosHjGSKkAn3GaOm3lhUBHoaGCWwMUiz46eZtHy7uFdkBMv ih2TYEC8y+LhOiECsFVU+O6POosty9MmdoWE1Y0uY/k4wHPmp3uHGjfs4iz/Ox6YQ/ 8FfKL4ig1zUOOV0KT/Acw4pp+iP0n8RIm+XU0jc+l94Jk37Q6YQI26oxPeDY8uR2ei RAASd5iAzDzDuNf9itjEYTAKqPAL7naTGW2zHInXH/ZN869LTRIfL/yPILYBU++gS2 rDLLfXeGo9RfB0biVsd2kyypuEmjcyTju87XCARTcH61z4PziVTuyfe3JgTi1tcP1C c/Jb5wO7OWSYQ== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --b6+NkB2aXYhLTocY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Great suggestion on STV - otherwise we might be in the predicament, as Stack has alluded ;) If STV is accepted for the method of tally then: 1. #579 (I wish the feather was an Apache one!) 2. #560 3. #60 Cos On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:56AM, Branko =C4=8Cibej wrote: > On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote: > > Engineers are bad at graphics. >=20 > Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of pre-press, > so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some of the > proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ... :) >=20 > > If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory > > tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we do some > > reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'. >=20 > Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1] (which is > used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely to give a > reasonable result. >=20 > My choice then would be: >=20 > 1. #200 > 2. #135 > 3. #560 >=20 >=20 > -- Brane >=20 > P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to tally the > results >=20 > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > [2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting --b6+NkB2aXYhLTocY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUVarYAAoJEKtmQW7Qw4JPDXQIAJjkCm8Lg/PjvcqDWdO4kXq/ 3I9qoTWMJmSEomP+c8FjpPRFp/hQ9JHMEXNxH4LMCsXMp9MFDa9VUYpTC0SeOYls W/F7UrxjLs90QnkdwrlxpULNLtGQDl5o2XeQHQGXl4zosGZmHOx46QXdcHToy0Kq KnVfSuZaLiXA5iP+tONKrwGY2rV3ytOfZs/IkA53er8IpjKFvttPbJflh2hXRmUz o+c2DrQIW5/xCxF3admd3PE/Nf8INpLtUzJR07SEsgI1eiuiB+IBeS/vdRHr9+vj mbje7sKUSu485OWEZ+8lMaYH6WaL9XS4Mm85hM+bnz781UzGgo5X5n99WAxAWls= =V9w5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b6+NkB2aXYhLTocY--