ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Date Fri, 07 Nov 2014 08:13:50 GMT
The votes were casted here, but mostly they were casted on 99designs
website (the link was sent out), and then the final version was worked out
directly with the designer.

It was the version picked by a majority (I, for instance, picked a
different one).

D.

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:

> Not to be picky, but if votes were casted it should have happened on the
> dev@
> where the [VOTE] started. Did I miss anything?
>
> Cos
>
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:11PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > Just to let everyone know, we closely looked at everyone's feedback (got
> > over 30 votes overall), and the winner is attached.
> >
> > Note that it does not have a feather anymore, simply because it looked
> bad
> > on smaller versions of the logo.
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Great suggestion on STV - otherwise we might be in the predicament, as
> > > Stack
> > > has alluded ;)
> > >
> > > If STV is accepted for the method of tally then:
> > >
> > > 1. #579 (I wish the feather was an Apache one!)
> > > 2. #560
> > > 3. #60
> > >
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:56AM, Branko ─îibej wrote:
> > > > On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote:
> > > > > Engineers are bad at graphics.
> > > >
> > > > Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of
> pre-press,
> > > > so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some of the
> > > > proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ... :)
> > > >
> > > > >  If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory
> > > > > tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest we do
> some
> > > > > reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'.
> > > >
> > > > Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1] (which
> is
> > > > used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely to
> give a
> > > > reasonable result.
> > > >
> > > > My choice then would be:
> > > >
> > > >  1. #200
> > > >  2. #135
> > > >  3. #560
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Brane
> > > >
> > > > P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to tally the
> > > > results
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> > > > [2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting
> > >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message