ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Boudnik <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] for a Apache Ignite Logo
Date Tue, 18 Nov 2014 06:02:33 GMT
To wrap this up: could anyone post the tally of the vote so the thread can be
closed?

Cos

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:15PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> Dmitriy, please provide the link to winner.
> 
> 
> --
> Yakov Zhdanov, Director R&D
> *GridGain Systems*
> www.gridgain.com
> 
> 2014-11-07 11:13 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@gridgain.com>:
> 
> > The votes were casted here, but mostly they were casted on 99designs
> > website (the link was sent out), and then the final version was worked out
> > directly with the designer.
> >
> > It was the version picked by a majority (I, for instance, picked a
> > different one).
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Not to be picky, but if votes were casted it should have happened on the
> > > dev@
> > > where the [VOTE] started. Did I miss anything?
> > >
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:11PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > > > Just to let everyone know, we closely looked at everyone's feedback
> > (got
> > > > over 30 votes overall), and the winner is attached.
> > > >
> > > > Note that it does not have a feather anymore, simply because it looked
> > > bad
> > > > on smaller versions of the logo.
> > > >
> > > > D.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Great suggestion on STV - otherwise we might be in the predicament,
> > as
> > > > > Stack
> > > > > has alluded ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > If STV is accepted for the method of tally then:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. #579 (I wish the feather was an Apache one!)
> > > > > 2. #560
> > > > > 3. #60
> > > > >
> > > > > Cos
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:56AM, Branko ─îibej wrote:
> > > > > > On 02.11.2014 00:35, Stack wrote:
> > > > > > > Engineers are bad at graphics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yup. Of course, some of us used to spend time in the pits of
> > > pre-press,
> > > > > > so we at least have a rough idea about what /not/ to do. Some
of
> > the
> > > > > > proposed logos would look great as gas station billboards ...
:)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >  If this VOTE comes up with an unsatisfactory
> > > > > > > tally -- there is no overwhelming winner -- then I'd suggest
we
> > do
> > > some
> > > > > > > reevaluation rather than just take the 'winner'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Instead of a plain vote, I suggest we use a variant of STV[1]
> > (which
> > > is
> > > > > > used, e.g., to vote for the ASF board[2]). That's more likely
to
> > > give a
> > > > > > reasonable result.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My choice then would be:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  1. #200
> > > > > >  2. #135
> > > > > >  3. #560
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Brane
> > > > > >
> > > > > > P.S.: I'm sure we could use the existing ASF voting tool to
tally
> > the
> > > > > > results
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> > > > > > [2] https://wiki.apache.org/general/BoardVoting
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >

Mime
View raw message