ibatis-user-java mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sundar Sankar <fatboys...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Should iBATIS support SQLJ?
Date Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:39:51 GMT
+1.  Support to all databases is definitely a great plus to have.

-Sundar

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Clinton Begin <clinton.begin@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> A group of developers have approached us with a contribution of code
> to patch iBATIS so that it supports SQLJ.
>
> If you've never heard of SQLJ, here are two links...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQLJ
> http://www.google.com/trends?q=sqlj
>
> The future of SQLJ is not clear to me, nor is its adoption rate over
> time.  Certainly iBATIS has a broader user base than SQLJ does.
>
> So the question is:  Should we support SQLJ as a feature of iBATIS?
>
> +5  ==  Absolutely... iBATIS will be better for it.
> +1  ==  Yes, support SQLJ.
>  0  ==  Doesn't matter to me.
> -1  ==  No, keep them separate.
> -5  ==  No way.  iBATIS is better off without it.
>
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> Cheers,
> Clinton
>

Mime
View raw message