ibatis-user-java mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zoran Avtarovski <zo...@sparecreative.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Should iBATIS support SQLJ?
Date Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:05:06 GMT
Apologies for being late. It was a long weekend down here.

0

I agree it¹s a dying technology, but if the contributors are willing to
maintain it and it won¹t affect performance for non SQLJ implementations...

Z.
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> A group of developers have approached us with a contribution of code
> to patch iBATIS so that it supports SQLJ.
> 
> If you've never heard of SQLJ, here are two links...
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQLJ
> http://www.google.com/trends?q=sqlj
> 
> The future of SQLJ is not clear to me, nor is its adoption rate over
> time.  Certainly iBATIS has a broader user base than SQLJ does.
> 
> So the question is:  Should we support SQLJ as a feature of iBATIS?
> 
> +5  ==  Absolutely... iBATIS will be better for it.
> +1  ==  Yes, support SQLJ.
>  0  ==  Doesn't matter to me.
> -1  ==  No, keep them separate.
> -5  ==  No way.  iBATIS is better off without it.
> 
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> 
> Cheers,
> Clinton



Mime
View raw message