Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53146 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2008 13:34:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2008 13:34:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 88309 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2008 13:34:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 88289 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2008 13:34:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-java-help@ibatis.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user-java@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 88201 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2008 13:34:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:34:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.52.246.188] (HELO MAIL.DIOSPHERE.com) (213.52.246.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:33:54 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8E811.6CE6E63E" Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] iBATIS 2.3.3 ... Beta is the new Production X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:34:19 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [ANNOUNCE] iBATIS 2.3.3 ... Beta is the new Production Thread-Index: AcjoEIT0Hgvp7fKvQWOkiRJ5QUetJQAALiYQ References: <16178eb10807161244p32306ffbkf3e467a362b824e1@mail.gmail.com> <487F1C05.7010108@gmail.com> <16178eb10807170620q603aabcaid80e4d4e6347d01@mail.gmail.com> From: "Dragan Jotanovic" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E811.6CE6E63E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Upgrading to newer version of iBatis is becoming more and more complicated.=20 So now we will have to wait for new version of spring in order to get new version of iBatis? Isn't it better just to revert all those changes back on branch 2.3.x and start new branch with those changes (2.4 or long waiting 3.0)? =20 =20 From: Clinton Begin [mailto:clinton.begin@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 2:21 PM To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iBATIS 2.3.3 ... Beta is the new Production =20 Wooooow...=20 K, it's looking more and more like we just need to update the Spring integration. I'm not willing to roll back all of the simplifications we made to the software. We got rid of a lot of internal cruft that just made the code harder to read and didn't serve a purpose.=20 I'll see what I can do to work with the Spring team to get it updated. I no longer consider this a bug, it's an evolution. Clinton On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Iwao AVE! wrote: Hi Clinton, I understand you need more testers, but then, why don't you publish these betas in the maven repository? It would increase the number of testers (1 at least =3D me). Sorry if this topic has been discussed already. Regards, Iwao =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E811.6CE6E63E Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Upgrading to newer version of iBatis is becoming more and = more complicated.

So now we will have to wait for new version of spring in = order to get new version of iBatis? Isn’t it better just to revert all = those changes back on branch 2.3.x and start new branch with those changes (2.4 or = long waiting 3.0)?

From:= Clinton = Begin [mailto:clinton.begin@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 2:21 PM
To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iBATIS 2.3.3 ... Beta is the new = Production

Wooooow...

K, it's looking more and more like we just need to update the Spring integration. I'm not willing to roll back all of the = simplifications we made to the software. We got rid of a lot of internal cruft that = just made the code harder to read and didn't serve a purpose.

I'll see what I can do to work with the Spring team to get it = updated. I no longer consider this a bug, it's an evolution.

Clinton

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Iwao AVE! <harawata@gmail.com> = wrote:

Hi Clinton,

I understand you need more testers, but then, why don't you publish = these betas in the maven repository?
It would increase the number of testers (1 at least =3D me).

Sorry if this topic has been discussed already.

Regards,
Iwao

------_=_NextPart_001_01C8E811.6CE6E63E--