Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90162 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2008 14:36:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2008 14:36:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 621 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2008 14:36:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 494 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2008 14:36:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-java-help@ibatis.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user-java@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 464 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2008 14:36:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:36:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of clinton.begin@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.179] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:28:26 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v33so3176932wah.24 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:27:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=9TRk+mbfJ/qeRQYoWLP4xDfjoDCA20NDKDNipD83Pb0=; b=FBEhph7s8S2aHcMZSimAXjxwDaqtaR2YYVHWxo0btLLVLKJcZQECy+I6b1VBHN+PZr Ox3wKb/xEESxUS6eH4CctG/jVt2nF+rmIw3W3oJKpNijlJtj8ULoFLN7VDi/ipCIUfTQ HW06gSpRyNyjHo4HfbBrtH3NXdt0IeV48g4EM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=rC+bQXnHoyuim6G3BP+qLwfn/YX4GG1FXkcQZwttRL5j07V5ZpECm9LJDTOZ67T2qe 1Q74blzYPtB3DIlsNf6Tqpg9XmOoxtYfQe5HgvzbCLBOLWsEi79ISezKAyzmEzaYON+f U/6NSJMgZRV7x3EkjE6/CcEHtNEpb9gQ0fups= Received: by 10.114.137.2 with SMTP id k2mr1701034wad.95.1216304861749; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.135.14 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <16178eb10807170727r29f06cc7g438c0f4213930182@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:27:41 -0600 From: "Clinton Begin" To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iBATIS 2.3.3 ... Beta is the new Production In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_61644_30102654.1216304861734" References: <16178eb10807161244p32306ffbkf3e467a362b824e1@mail.gmail.com> <487F1C05.7010108@gmail.com> <16178eb10807170620q603aabcaid80e4d4e6347d01@mail.gmail.com> <16178eb10807170640y1c43e816y54d16141a70d72ab@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_61644_30102654.1216304861734 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Absolutely. The only reason that version 2.x has been so quiet lately is that I've been focused on version 3.0. Initially I didn't think a compatibility kit would be possible, but it's looking more and more like it will be. I'm nearly finished it to a point where I can make a release of an iBATIS 3.0 Alpha with 2.x compatibility. There are a few features intentionally left out of 3.0 though, including nullValue substitution, direct XML mappings and of course the existing deprecated stuff like PaginatedList etc. That said, 2.3.3 is a really big release, and I probably should have called it 2.4. But live and learn... It's not like the mistake hasn't been made before (Windows 3.1 ... ;-) iBATIS has been around for 6 years, and we're the only framework of our kind. So we're not going anywhere. http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-07-2008/jw-07-orm-comparison.html Cheers, Clinton On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Ian Zabel wrote: > As a new user to iBatis (we just began using it two weeks ago at my > company!), I just want to give you guys a big thanks for your work on > the framework. It's made it a lot more comfortable to know that iBatis > is under active development, and has a lively community around it. > > Keep up the good work! > > Ian. > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Clinton Begin > wrote: > > > > No. The Spring integration is using internals of iBATIS which are not > meant to be publicly consumed. We're not going to stop evolving our code > just to keep compatible with 3rd party frameworks that reach into the guts > of iBATIS. Waiting for 2.4 would just delay the inevitable. > > > > The solutions is: > > > > * Update the Spring plug-in, and > > * Use 2.3.0 until it is updated. > > > > This doesn't happen every day. In fact it's the first time it's happened > in 4 years. Let's not make it out to be more of an issue than it is. > Spring will be updated and all will be well. > > > > Clinton > ------=_Part_61644_30102654.1216304861734 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Absolutely.  The only reason that version 2.x has been so quiet lately is that I've been focused on version 3.0.  Initially I didn't think a compatibility kit would be possible, but it's looking more and more like it will be.  I'm nearly finished it to a point where I can make a release of an iBATIS 3.0 Alpha with 2.x compatibility.  There are a few features intentionally left out of 3.0 though, including nullValue substitution, direct XML mappings and of course the existing deprecated stuff like PaginatedList etc.

That said, 2.3.3 is a really big release, and I probably should have called it 2.4.  But live and learn... It's not like the mistake hasn't been made before (Windows 3.1 ... ;-)

iBATIS has been around for 6 years, and we're the only framework of our kind.  So we're not going anywhere.

http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-07-2008/jw-07-orm-comparison.html

Cheers,
Clinton

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Ian Zabel <ian@ezabel.com> wrote:
As a new user to iBatis (we just began using it two weeks ago at my
company!), I just want to give you guys a big thanks for your work on
the framework. It's made it a lot more comfortable to know that iBatis
is under active development, and has a lively community around it.

Keep up the good work!

Ian.

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Clinton Begin <clinton.begin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No.  The Spring integration is using internals of iBATIS which are not meant to be publicly consumed.  We're not going to stop evolving our code just to keep compatible with 3rd party frameworks that reach into the guts of iBATIS.  Waiting for 2.4 would just delay the inevitable.
>
> The solutions is:
>
>   * Update the Spring plug-in, and
>   * Use 2.3.0 until it is updated.
>
> This doesn't happen every day.  In fact it's the first time it's happened in 4 years.  Let's not make it out to be more of an issue than it is.  Spring will be updated and all will be well.
>
> Clinton

------=_Part_61644_30102654.1216304861734--