Return-Path: 
 <user-java-return-11804-apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive=ibatis.apache.org@ibatis.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67598 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2007 03:26:44 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jun 2007 03:26:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 66852 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2007 03:26:44 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@ibatis.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66837 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2007 03:26:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-java-help@ibatis.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-java-help@ibatis.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-java-unsubscribe@ibatis.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user-java@ibatis.apache.org>
List-Id: <user-java.ibatis.apache.org>
Reply-To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user-java@ibatis.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66822 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2007 03:26:44 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:26:44 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of larry.meadors@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.174 as permitted sender)
Received: from [66.249.92.174] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.174)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:26:39 -0700
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so614770uge
        for <user-java@ibatis.apache.org>;
 Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=ORW/Pg63wNOhj1s8CikF0S0sBCKBV5jyZjc8UdOgb7g/md6H1OTbAosT7YJuxQN+mgho/Yt49l+zBNvDLBfQ3UR5osA9SyzWopzF4WSsa/ePRTjdZX5+BdT+XYXdIZ9JAyR8EdhBOMTv1Lhgd9lSi8tgkmup1bcWuhx7+ITu7Z4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=XiCy86SG7B47HmkNaIqmACwPWKi4MznpKzQ1YWiwOR8KtUNv0hXd/r/I7uOpZHmEqK3jzZpBlRaFpLR/by/IkkAAkwcQSSZ3S3f3fvkIraBpKxGOz8KHeEX538fSb7AGIKShg+EQTbunhDofmskb/b7cugaP/J6brdhowudg7qY=
Received: by 10.78.184.2 with SMTP id h2mr552068huf.1181186777613;
        Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.58.4 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 20:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a10a823c0706062026r43a23e5am8aca8a826359c96@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:26:17 -0600
From: "Larry Meadors" <lmeadors@apache.org>
Reply-To: lmeadors@apache.org
Sender: larry.meadors@gmail.com
To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org, "Gwyn Evans" <gwyn.evans@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cache object reference
In-Reply-To: <1957984991.20070606211424@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <AS-SMTP05UreQiiAI1k00041e29@as-smtp05.he.businessgateway.co.za>
	 <a10a823c0706060359j45558cbenb39762eb374a4632@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1957984991.20070606211424@gmail.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: d35a874f6001fcf1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

<shameless-plug>Ya, it's in the book, buy it! :-)</shameless-plug>

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932394826?ie=UTF8&tag=ai0e-20&link_code=as3&camp=211189&creative=373489&creativeASIN=1932394826

Larry


On 6/6/07, Gwyn Evans <gwyn.evans@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 6, 2007, 11:59:47 AM, Larry <lmeadors@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On 6/6/07, Meindert <meindert@pastelebusiness.com> wrote:
> >> Is it by design that the object returned from the cache has the same object
> >> reference as the on in the cache?
>
> > In your cache definition, you have readonly="true", but are not
> > modifying the results. You are a very bad boy. Don't do that. :-)
>
> Don't you mean "but are modifying the results"?   :-)
>
> Anyway, for the OP, Larry's obviously too polite, but "iBATIS in
> Action" has a good explanation about this (and a lot else) - See
> section 9.3.4 on p200.
>
> /Gwyn
>
>