Return-Path: 
 <user-java-return-8405-apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive=ibatis.apache.org@ibatis.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17684 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2006 15:05:30 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2006 15:05:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 90703 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2006 15:05:29 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@ibatis.apache.org
Received: (qmail 90595 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2006 15:05:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-java-help@ibatis.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-java-help@ibatis.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-java-unsubscribe@ibatis.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user-java@ibatis.apache.org>
List-Id: <user-java.ibatis.apache.org>
Reply-To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user-java@ibatis.apache.org
Received: (qmail 90584 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2006 15:05:28 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:05:28 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [192.18.98.31] (HELO brmea-mail-1.sun.com) (192.18.98.31)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:05:15 -0700
Received: from fe-amer-04.sun.com ([192.18.108.178])
	by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k7AF4nXe026973
	for <user-java@ibatis.apache.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:04:49 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com
 (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep  9 2005))
 id <0J3S00301F50Y900@mail-amer.sun.com>
 (original mail from Nathan.Maves@Sun.COM) for user-java@ibatis.apache.org;
 Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:04:49 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from [129.147.48.168] by mail-amer.sun.com
 (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep  9 2005))
 with ESMTPSA id <0J3S00DXMF81E0Y4@mail-amer.sun.com> for
 user-java@ibatis.apache.org; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:04:49 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:06:41 -0600
From: Nathan Maves <Nathan.Maves@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: Duplicate typeHandler (same javaType, different jdbcType)
In-reply-to: <5735284.post@talk.nabble.com>
Sender: Nathan.Maves@Sun.COM
To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org
Message-id: <60C73869-AC83-4B91-9037-F03915495579@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <5735284.post@talk.nabble.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Just a thought but why are you writing your own Date/Timestamp  
handlers?  Both of these are covered by TypeHandlers that are bundled  
with ibatis.

You can find their code here http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ibatis/ 
trunk/java/mapper/mapper2/src/com/ibatis/sqlmap/engine/type/

If you are trying to do something other then insert/update date  
fields please clarify you problem or question.

Nathan

On Aug 9, 2006, at 4:47 PM, jaybytez wrote:

>
> TypeHandler gives me accessibility to the SQL Type so I know if the  
> user is
> using the typeHandler for two different SQL data types and perform the
> necessary get/set based on that type.  For instance, Date and  
> Timestamp
> correlate to the same object DateTime (in my application).  So if  
> the type
> that is required is a sql Date...I can do the proper get/set for  
> SQL Date,
> and likewise for Timestamp.  With TypeHandlerCallback...I will not  
> have that
> accessibility.  So if I create a DateTime/Timestamp handler  
> callback and
> DateTime/Date handler callback...can I register both in the  
> sqlMapConfig?
> Or would iBatis not know what conversion to do when it hits a DateTime
> object?
>
> Current Code:
>         <typeHandler  
> javaType="com.healthnet.hnfs.common.util.DateTime"
>                  
> callback="com.foo.dao.datahandler.DateTimeTypeHandler"/>
>
> Future Code:
>
>         <typeHandler jdbcType="TIMESTAMP"
> callback="com.foo.dao.datahandler.DateTimeTypeHandler"/>
>         <typeHandler jdbcType="DATE"
> callback="com.foo.dao.datahandler.DateTimeTypeHandler"/>
>
> Is this correct?  Without stating the javaType for duplication?
>
> Thanks,
>
> jay
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Duplicate- 
> typeHandler-%28same-javaType%2C-different-jdbcType%29- 
> tf2081707.html#a5735284
> Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java forum at Nabble.com.
>