Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73473 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2006 12:31:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2006 12:31:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 58753 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2006 12:30:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 58548 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2006 12:30:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-java-help@ibatis.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user-java@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 58536 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2006 12:30:57 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:30:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [24.201.245.36] (HELO relais.videotron.ca) (24.201.245.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:30:57 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([66.130.106.234]) by VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J3Z00LDBMQZSMA0@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for user-java@ibatis.apache.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:30:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:34:23 -0400 From: David Gagnon Subject: Updating from ibatis 1.3.1 to 2.1.7 .. should I? Does it worth the effort? To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org Message-id: <44E06DCF.5090702@siunik.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi all, I've been working with ibatis for several years but because version 1.3+ wasn't supporting multiple datasource in the sqlmap I didn't update since this time:-( I don't have this limitation anymore and I wonder if the upgrade worth the effort. I probably have arroud 60 sql maps. I patched 1.3 to support some custom type too! Is 2.1.7 is faster ? Too for the migration path what is that gone be hard? I remembered I need to use some ant task to convert my map to the new format. Since the gap is growing between the releases it getting more and more difficult to have a clear view... Thanks for any help.. it`s really appreciated! Best Regards /David