ibatis-user-java mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gwyn Evans" <gwyn.ev...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Does JDBC 4.0 make iBATIS redundant?
Date Sat, 05 Aug 2006 06:19:19 GMT
As a Wicket user, I'm happy to do a lot of things in Java, but SQL
code isn't one of them. That, to me, makes sense to be split out, even
leaving aside all the other things iBATIS brings to the party...

/Gwyn

On 05/08/06, Clinton Begin <clinton.begin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just picked this up from InfoQ.  What do you think?
>
>
> =====================
> Blogger Patrick Lightbody noted "I could see JDBC 4.0 replacing my need for
> iBatis" after reading another blog post on JDBC 4.0 functionality. JDBC 4.0
> includes basic O/R mapper functionality that eases the repetitive task of
> copying ResultSet data into objects. It does not handle inheritance or table
> relations however.
> =====================
>
>
> http://www.infoq.com/news/Easier-Database-Development-JDBC
>
> Patrick's a good guy and a respected developer.  I appreciate his opinion.
> Obviously, this is only useful for people running JDK 5 or possibly only JDK
> 6.  And of course, Annotation support would be an almost brainless effort to
> implement for iBATIS.  Your thoughts?
>
> Clinton
>


-- 
Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! - http://wicketframework.org

Mime
View raw message