ibatis-user-java mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Clinton Begin" <clinton.be...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Real difference between TypeHandler and TypeHandlerCallback
Date Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:46:17 GMT
Yep!

Look at the interfaces, the differences become more clear.

Cheers,
Clinton

On 8/28/06, Jan Vissers <Jan.Vissers@cumquat.nl> wrote:
>
> Well okay then...
> So I take it basically they can do the same for me?
>
> Clinton Begin wrote:
> > TypeHandlerCallback is more abstract and simpler/safer to implement.
> >
> > TypeHandler is a bit trickier to implement and is a bit closer to the
> > metal.
> >
> > You can use either one to implement a custom type handler. My
> > recommendation
> > is to use TypeHandlerCallback , and then only use TypeHandler only when
> > necessary.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Clinton
> >
> > On 8/28/06, Jan Vissers <Jan.Vissers@cumquat.nl> wrote:
> >>
> >> Apart from the fact that the former is engine and latter is client -
> >> what are the real differences?
> >> Reason I'm asking, is didn't have any issues specifying a (custom)
> >> TypeHandler class in my mapping instead of a TypeHandlerCallBack.
> >> (O yeah, I couldn't only specify the TypeHandler, but also use it)
> >>
> >> Are these two interchangeable?
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Cumquat Information Technology
> De Dreef 19
> 3706 BR Zeist
> T +31 (0)30 - 6940490
> F +31 (0)30 - 6940499
> http://www.cumquat.nl
>
> Jan.Vissers@cumquat.nl
> M +31 6 51 169 556
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message