Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70759 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2006 16:29:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jun 2006 16:29:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 28647 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2006 16:29:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-java-archive@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 28604 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2006 16:29:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-java-help@ibatis.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user-java@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 28593 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2006 16:29:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:29:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of erlend.bjorge@aftenposten.no designates 80.91.34.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.34.51] (HELO mx1.aftenposten.no) (80.91.34.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:29:05 -0700 Received: from localhost (amavis-mx1.aftenposten.no [80.91.34.52]) by mx1.aftenposten.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5958DD46486 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:28:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.aftenposten.no ([80.91.34.51]) by localhost (amavis-mx1.aftenposten.no [80.91.34.52]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 41039-01 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:28:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blaster1.schibsted.no (unknown [80.91.34.4]) by mx1.aftenposten.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71116D46461 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:28:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sch-mail-01.schibsted.no (unverified) by blaster1.schibsted.no (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.2.5) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:30:08 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C696E2.1717C17F" Subject: SV: Abator wishlist Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:28:41 +0200 Message-ID: <53B9256F9D1D3B42A90ACFACA0B745232DC9FE@sch-mail-01.schibsted.no> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Abator wishlist Thread-Index: AcaW39l1sL6d64b1QiSKl4onMhl1sgAAU+eQ From: To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C696E2.1717C17F Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there! =20 >Gareth wrote: >Most of the hand written domain objects I have are completely flat = POJOs - there is no separate class for primary key - most of the time, = there are no >primary keys on the database - so I'd like all of the = Abator generated objects to be the same. Can we turn off generation of = primary key classes for those >tables where primary keys are present and = just use flat objects? =20 I have been using Ibatis for 2 years (and Hibernate for 1 year) now and = I'm not sure why you "want" to have separate primary key classes for = your model beans ?=20 Not sure why that should be good for ? News for me, can anyone tell me = why ? :-)=20 =20 Btw, not heard about Abator before, that sound interesting :-) =20 Thanks, Erlend Bj=F8rge ------_=_NextPart_001_01C696E2.1717C17F Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi = there!

 

>Gareth = wrote:
>Most of = the hand written domain objects I have are completely flat POJOs - there is no = separate class for primary key - most of the time, there are no >primary keys on the database - so = I'd like all of the Abator generated objects to be the same. Can we turn off = generation of primary key classes for those >tables where primary keys are present and just use flat objects?

 =

I have been = using Ibatis for 2 years (and Hibernate for 1 year) now and I’m not sure why you = “want” to have separate primary key classes for your model beans ? =

Not sure why = that should be good for ? News for me, can anyone tell me why ? J =

 =

Btw, not heard = about Abator before, that sound interesting J

 =

Thanks,

Erlend = Bj=F8rge




------_=_NextPart_001_01C696E2.1717C17F--