ibatis-user-java mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Larry Meadors <larry.mead...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: .Net vs Java
Date Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:38:16 GMT
...and hopefully get the xml formats closer. ;-)

On 7/21/05, Clinton Begin <clinton.begin@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  I expect we'll start discussing iBATIS 3.0 sometime in September.  At that
> time, we can consolodate features, design and also align the version
> numbers.
>  
>  Cheers,
>  Clinton
> 
> 
> On 7/20/05, Gilles Bayon <ibatis.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The .NET and Java version don't followed the same roadmap as the .NET is
> younger than Java but .NET team expect to reach the same level of
> fonctionnality of the Java version. 
> > The .NET version as its beginning was based on the first version of
> iBATIS.Java (which it is the current version at this time) and 2/3 months
> latter Clinton introduced the version 2 of iBATIS.Java :-!. 
> > Since this time, the .NET version have been refactoring in a transparent
> way to introduce the fonctionnalities of iBATIS.Java V2 and we continue. 
> >   
> > DataAccess 1.6.1 GA  == mixed of Java DAO V1 and V2 
> > .NET DataMapper 1.2.1 GA  == Java Data Mapper V2 without all the
> fonctionnalities
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > On 7/20/05, Nathan Maves <Nathan.Maves@sun.com > wrote: 
> > > Do they follow the same road map?
> > > 
> > > Are the following statements true?
> > > 
> > > .NET DataMapper 1.2.1 == Java Data Mapper 
> > > DataAccess 1.6.1 Beta! == Java DAO
> > > 
> > > If so why not use a standard naming convention?
> > > 
> > > Wow I am really on a rant today :)
> > > 
> > > Nathan
> > > On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:49 PM, Larry Meadors wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On 7/20/05, Nathan Maves < Nathan.Maves@sun.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> How is the team managing these two projects?
> > > >> 
> > > >
> > > > Pretty well. ;-) Kidding aside, their are two teams with a tiny bit of
> > > > overlap..I know Ron and I both use both versions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Do they use the same code base?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Nope, they are totally independent.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Can we expect the same functionality from both? 
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Not identical, but *very* similar.
> > > >
> > > > Larry
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>

Mime
View raw message