Mailing-List: contact ibatis-user-java-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ibatis-user-java@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 22:14:11 -0600
From: Nathan Maves <Nathan.Maves@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: Availability of 2.1.0
In-reply-to: <16178eb10505122053462353da@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: Nathan.Maves@Sun.COM
To: ibatis-user-java@incubator.apache.org
Message-id: <909cbaa9987a32c3101ddab34411fa1d@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Boundary_(ID_t/T8avzzLLCjTpjlqYbUJQ)"
References: <20050512211423.4294.qmail@web80727.mail.yahoo.com>
 <16178eb10505122053462353da@mail.gmail.com>


--Boundary_(ID_t/T8avzzLLCjTpjlqYbUJQ)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Now that we are on the topic.....

Is this a bug fix release or a feature release?

In the case that it is a feature release what can we expect?

Nathan

On May 12, 2005, at 9:53 PM, Clinton Begin wrote:

> Karen,
>
>  A release could be as early as this weekend, but is not guaranteed.
>
>  I'm sure if it's not, that we can at least commit to giving you (and=20=

> everyone else) a date.
>
>  Sorry for the lack of clarity here.
>
>  Cheers,
>  Clinton
>
> On 5/12/05, Karen Koch <kmkoch@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> can't give you any real answer", that would be helpful.
>>
>> Also, just to verify, do I understand correctly that the fix for=20
>> IBATIS-79 in
>> Jira will not be available until version 2.1.0 (presumably not=20
>> released yet) is
>> released?
>>
>> Thanks in advance, sorry to be a pest.
>>
>> Karen
>> --- Karen Koch <kmkoch@sbcglobal.net > wrote:
>> > Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
>> > From: Karen Koch <kmkoch@sbcglobal.net>
>> > Subject: Availability of 2.1.0
>> > To: ibatis-user-java@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>> > Hello --
>> >
>> > I know one person already asked this in mid-April and didn't=20
>> receive an
>> > answer,
>> > so perhaps you just don't know yet... but I'm going to ask anyway.
>> >
>> > I have an iBATIS app that uses nested resultMaps being introduced=20=

>> at a
>> > customer
>> > site in the next month or so.=A0=A0I just spent 7 hours chasing =
down=20
>> Jira bug #79
>> > in my web app ( http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-79),=20
>> because I had
>> > primary keys on two tables related in a nested resultMap that just=20=

>> happened
>> > to
>> > be in sync.=A0=A0Such fun.=A0=A0:-)
>> >
>> > Anyway, I see that this problem has been fixed in 2.1.0.=A0=A0I'd=20=

>> really like to
>> > have this fix, as the situation that causes the bug is perfectly=20
>> valid and
>> > might occur easily in the future, but I don't see us upgrading to a=20=

>> nightly
>> > build for something we're going to install at a customer=20
>> site.=A0=A0Help?
>> >
>> > Thank you so much for any info you can give regarding the 2.1.0=20
>> release /
>> > release date.=A0=A0iBATIS has been wonderful for this =
project.=A0=A0Keep up=20
>> the great
>> > work.
>> >
>> > Karen Koch
>>  > Programmer/Analyst
>> > iDC Chicago, IL
>> >
>> >
>> >

--Boundary_(ID_t/T8avzzLLCjTpjlqYbUJQ)
Content-type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Now that we are on the topic.....


Is this a bug fix release or a feature release?


In the case that it is a feature release what can we expect?


Nathan


On May 12, 2005, at 9:53 PM, Clinton Begin wrote:


<excerpt>Karen,


 A release could be as early as this weekend, but is not guaranteed.


 I'm sure if it's not, that we can at least commit to giving you (and
everyone else) a date.


 Sorry for the lack of clarity here.=20


 Cheers,

 Clinton


On 5/12/05, <bold>Karen Koch</bold>
<<<color><param>0000,0000,EEEE</param>kmkoch@sbcglobal.net</color>>
wrote:

<excerpt>can't give you any real answer", that would be helpful.


Also, just to verify, do I understand correctly that the fix for
IBATIS-79 in=20

Jira will not be available until version 2.1.0 (presumably not
released yet) is

released?


Thanks in advance, sorry to be a pest.


Karen

--- Karen Koch
<<<color><param>0000,0000,EEEE</param>kmkoch@sbcglobal.net </color>>
wrote:

> Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT)

> From: Karen Koch
<<<color><param>0000,0000,EEEE</param>kmkoch@sbcglobal.net</color>>

> Subject: Availability of 2.1.0

> To:
=
<color><param>0000,0000,EEEE</param>ibatis-user-java@incubator.apache.org<=
/color>

>

> Hello --

>

> I know one person already asked this in mid-April and didn't receive
an

> answer,

> so perhaps you just don't know yet... but I'm going to ask anyway.=20

>

> I have an iBATIS app that uses nested resultMaps being introduced at a

> customer

> site in the next month or so.=A0=A0I just spent 7 hours chasing down
Jira bug #79

> in my web app (<color><param>0000,0000,EEEE</param>
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-79</color>), because I had

> primary keys on two tables related in a nested resultMap that just
happened

> to

> be in sync.=A0=A0Such fun.=A0=A0:-)

>

> Anyway, I see that this problem has been fixed in 2.1.0.=A0=A0I'd =
really
like to

> have this fix, as the situation that causes the bug is perfectly
valid and

> might occur easily in the future, but I don't see us upgrading to a
nightly

> build for something we're going to install at a customer site.=A0=A0Help=
?

>

> Thank you so much for any info you can give regarding the 2.1.0
release /

> release date.=A0=A0iBATIS has been wonderful for this project.=A0=A0Keep=
 up
the great

> work.

>

> Karen Koch

 > Programmer/Analyst

> iDC Chicago, IL

>

>

>

</excerpt></excerpt>=

--Boundary_(ID_t/T8avzzLLCjTpjlqYbUJQ)--