Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ibatis-user-java-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16664 invoked from network); 25 May 2005 20:39:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 May 2005 20:39:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 24041 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2005 20:39:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ibatis-user-java-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 24008 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2005 20:39:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ibatis-user-java-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ibatis-user-java@incubator.apache.org List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list ibatis-user-java@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23976 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2005 20:39:18 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from ctb-mesg2.saix.net (HELO ctb-mesg2.saix.net) (196.25.240.74) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2005 13:39:14 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (rndf-146-26-147.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.26.147]) by ctb-mesg2.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D973D16 for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 22:38:47 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <4294E257.4070909@isanusi.com> Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 22:38:47 +0200 From: Abdullah Kauchali User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ibatis-user-java@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: R: Query performs differently in SQL Query Analyzer [SOLVED] References: <20050525113940.90BF3212933@mxvwall-06.worldonline.co.za> In-Reply-To: <20050525113940.90BF3212933@mxvwall-06.worldonline.co.za> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Fabrizio Gianneschi wrote: > The Microsoft JDBC driver for SQLServer is ***very*** buggy. We haven't had any serious performance problems with MS JDBC. Could this be the nvarchar unicode issue? http://groups.google.co.za/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.jdbcdriver/browse_thread/thread/c11b52262f313bcb/db54939e2f1bb042?q=jdbc+unicode+performance+microsoft+SendStringParametersAsUnicode+kauchali&rnum=1&hl=en#db54939e2f1bb042