Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ibatis-user-java-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ibatis-user-java@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64286 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2005 05:02:19 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of clinton.begin@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.198 as permitted sender) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:02:18 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so656521wra for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:02:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=qgQeExDor6vGpHXQs/K9mqcSICRXKJnCTNRr0iPo9RX8A/d6xtcZJOQnP/i2eDPddOwWm8Z5oYniJ2ds6I5Em9MKGoLtg7qaZRvLB+vlPtXPUyuu4/ltcgNQDe9HMGLnYA2SKO/sl5AfFhNURzF2hnZZmagOJkEN9U8iwG/Gk6Y= Received: by 10.54.32.55 with SMTP id f55mr28864wrf; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:02:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.33.30 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:02:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <16178eb1050206210277e5090f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 22:02:15 -0700 From: Clinton Begin Reply-To: cbegin@ibatis.com To: ibatis-user-java@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Flexible ResultMaps (Again) In-Reply-To: <4206968B.40004@swiftdsl.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <42043D40.1000405@swiftdsl.com.au> <42052B8F.2000809@friendvu.com> <420540D9.1020005@swiftdsl.com.au> <420544EC.3000201@friendvu.com> <42054804.7030105@swiftdsl.com.au> <42054A26.2070001@friendvu.com> <42063315.9070400@friendvu.com> <16178eb105020608482f8ce068@mail.gmail.com> <4206968B.40004@swiftdsl.com.au> X-Virus-Checked: Checked I believe we already answered your question...this is the second thread you've posted on the subject, no? Clinton On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:13:31 +1100, Huy wrote: > Clinton Begin wrote: > >>>Looosly typed! > > > > > > That's not loose typing. It's NO typing. > > > > The type that's missing isn't what you think it is. The type that's > > missing is your domain class definition. You don't have types at all. > > You just have collections of implicitly related information. > > > > In any case, I appreciate your heavy, thorough testing of our Map > > support (seriously actually). ;-) > > > > Cheers, > > Clinton > > > > Now that you guys have concluded that map usage is not desirable ( I > totally agree), is there any chance of answering my original question > about the flexible resultmaps ? > > Thanks. > > Huy >