ibatis-user-java mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clinton Begin <clinton.be...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Bean Factory is available?
Date Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:37:46 GMT
Sounds like a discussion for the dev list.  Consider adding it to JIRA
as a wish and pass the idea by the dev list.

Cheers,
Clinton


On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:30:53 -0500, Philippe Laflamme
<philippe.laflamme@mail.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> I'm not sure adding the functionality in the DAO would be very efficient.
> Maybe I'm missing your point, but consider the queryForList() method, it
> would require iterating on the results to create a proxy for each item in
> the List... It would be much more efficient if the proxying mechanism (or
> whatever) was applied upon bean creation.
> 
> Personally, I think that having an external bean instantiation mechanism
> would make iBatis a much more flexible framework... For example, it could
> help unit tests for statements (create test beans to test set and get
> calls), all sorts of caching, initialisation or security processes could be
> applied but most of all, statement result classes could be defined as
> interfaces. To me, the last point is the most interesting...
> 
> Would anybody else find it useful to have interfaces instead of classes when
> mapping statement results? What does the iBatis dev team think?
> 
> Thanks,
> Philippe
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Clinton Begin [mailto:clinton.begin@gmail.com]
> > Sent: January 15, 2005 11:23 AM
> > To: ibatis-user-java@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Bean Factory is available?
> >
> >
> > Hi Tak,
> >
> > No, that's not something we support.  But that sounds like
> > something that would be best done by your DAO class.  An
> > alternative would be to put a dynamic proxy behind the
> > SqlMapClient interface and proxy your classes on the way out
> > of the queryForXxxxxx methods.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Clinton
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:08:34 -0500,
> > takyoshida_consultant@cusa.canon.com
> > <takyoshida_consultant@cusa.canon.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there a way to set bean Factory to resultMap instead of setting
> > > bean class directly? I mean,
> > > <resultMap id="result" class="my.model.Person">
> > > to something like
> > > <resultMap id="result" class="my.PersonFactory">
> > >
> > > so that I could create proxy on top of my class.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Tak
> > >
> >
> 
>

Mime
View raw message