ibatis-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeff Butler" <jeffgbut...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Status of 2.3 Release
Date Fri, 01 Dec 2006 23:41:54 GMT
I forgot about that conversation, I was thinking of this one:

http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ibatis.apache.org/msg01855.html

A great example of selective memory on my part :)

Anyway I'm open to a GA vote for 2.2 if we need to.  But maybe we should let
the dust settle on 2.3 for a few days.  If it looks like it will fly, then
we could do the 2.3 GA vote a little sooner.  The major thing in 2.3 was
prepared statement caching and I know there's already been some public
testing of it.  Most of the fixes I did were for esoteric issues.  I think
2.3 is pretty solid.

Your thoughts - should I post the 2.2 build to the mirrors?  That wouldn't
take much effort now that I know how to sign releases (it was a strange trip
into command line hacker heaven).

Jeff Butler



On 12/1/06, Clinton Begin <clinton.begin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> To clarify, what I suggested a week or so ago was:
>
> "We can vote for GA anytime, even after another release makes it to GA.
> The beta, alpha, GA status is always flexible.  We could vote for GA on
> 2.2. right now actually. "
>
> So a little closer to what Brandon is suggesting.  However, I'm more
> interested in leaving 2.1.7 and 2.2 in the past and getting 2.3 to GA.
>
> Cheers,
> Clinton
>
> On 12/1/06, Jeff Butler <jeffgbutler@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > We discussed this some weeks ago.  IIRC, Clinton wanted to do a new
> > release rather than voting for GA on 2.2.
> >
> > Jeff Butler
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/1/06, Brandon Goodin <brandon.goodin@gmail.com > wrote:
> > >
> > > Curious why we are superceding 2.2 wit 2.3? 2.2 has been available for
> > > some time and contains several bug fixes over 2.1.7. I would also say
> > > that 2.2.0 could be made GA. The other thought is that there is no
> > > guarantee that 2.3 will be GA quality after we get it out there for 2
> > > weeks, however unlikely that may be. Thanks for getting this all together!
> > >
> > > B
> > >
> > > On 11/30/06, Jeff Butler <jeffgbutler@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I have everything built for 2.3, and have everything signed and
> > > > checksummed.  Unfortunately, there are permission problems in the .../dist
> > > > directories, so I'm stuck right now.  I've sent a note to infra@ and as
soon
> > > > as they get the permission problems resolved, then I'll be able to publish
> > > > the release.
> > > >
> > > > This will be the first iBATIS/Java release that uses the Apache
> > > > mirroring structure - I'm going to implement the new Apache release policy
> > > > according to the notice the committers received a couple of weeks ago.
> > > >
> > > > My release plan looks like this:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Post the 2.3 and 2.1.7 builds to the mirrors.  2.3 will superceed
> > > > 2.2, so no need to post it
> > > > 2. Label 2.3 as beta, 2.1.7 is still the GA release
> > > > 3. Call for a vote for 2.3 GA two weeks after 2.3 is posted
> > > >
> > > > I'll keep you posted - hopefully I'll get it done tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > Jeff Butler
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message