ibatis-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Clinton Begin" <clinton.be...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Status of 2.3 Release
Date Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:25:04 GMT
Sold.  +1

On 12/2/06, Jeff Butler <jeffgbutler@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think it's a good idea too.
>
> I could sign the 2.2.0 zip and publish it to the mirrors.  I want to add
> the 2.2 PDF docs to it first though.  Then everything for the last DAO
> release (including docs) would be in one place.
>
> Sound like a plan?
> Jeff
>
>
> On 12/2/06, Brandon Goodin <brandon.goodin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think that would be good (of course) :D.
> >
> > Brandon
> >
> > On 12/1/06, Clinton Begin <clinton.begin@gmail.com > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > That's a great point.  I've had similar discussions.
> > >
> > > How about this:  Let's do the vote for 2.2. GA right now.  Assuming it
> > > passes (I don't see why not considering how long it's been out), we update
> > > 2.1.7 to 2.2 on the website by Monday.
> > >
> > > Then, next Friday (7 days) we start the vote for 2.3 GA and give it 7
> > > more days to settle.  Within two weeks we'll have a 2.2 and a 2.3 GA.
> > >
> > > I agree that we should probably GA 2.2 because people are already
> > > using it, but also because it's the last DAO release...that way we have a
> > > GA'd final DAO.
> > >
> > > Sound good?
> > >
> > > Clinton
> > >
> > >  On 12/1/06, Brandon Goodin < brandon.goodin@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm fine with pushing 2.3. But, I had a conversation on the list
> > > > with someone who feared upgrading to 2.2 because it wasn't GA. This
> > > > was, apparently, a company policy. They need a feature that is available
in
> > > > 2.2 but will not upgrade because it is not GA. If we do not make 2.2GA
then their company policy will continue to hold them up. I guess I don't
> > > > see a reason why we wouldn't make it GA. It has been available for some
time
> > > > with fewer bugs than 2.1.7. If I were to blow off any release I'd
> > > > blow off 2.1.7 because it conatins more bugs than 2.2.
> > > >
> > > > Brandon
> > > >
> > > > On 12/1/06, Clinton Begin <clinton.begin@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > My vote is to leave it the way it is.  My conservative, pragmatic
> > > > > and adventurous sides are all satisfied by having a single GA release
as
> > > > > well as the latest "Beta" release available for download.  2.2 is
> > > > > available in the past releases if people want it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Clinton
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/1/06, Jeff Butler < jeffgbutler@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I forgot about that conversation, I was thinking of this one:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ibatis.apache.org/msg01855.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A great example of selective memory on my part :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anyway I'm open to a GA vote for 2.2 if we need to.  But maybe
> > > > > > we should let the dust settle on 2.3 for a few days.  If it
> > > > > > looks like it will fly, then we could do the 2.3 GA vote a
> > > > > > little sooner.  The major thing in 2.3 was prepared statement
> > > > > > caching and I know there's already been some public testing
of it.  Most of
> > > > > > the fixes I did were for esoteric issues.  I think 2.3 is pretty
> > > > > > solid.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your thoughts - should I post the 2.2 build to the mirrors?
> > > > > > That wouldn't take much effort now that I know how to sign releases
(it was
> > > > > > a strange trip into command line hacker heaven).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jeff Butler
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12/1/06, Clinton Begin <clinton.begin@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To clarify, what I suggested a week or so ago was:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "We can vote for GA anytime, even after another release
makes
> > > > > > > it to GA.  The beta, alpha, GA status is always flexible.
 We could vote for
> > > > > > > GA on 2.2. right now actually. "
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So a little closer to what Brandon is suggesting.  However,
> > > > > > > I'm more interested in leaving 2.1.7 and 2.2 in the past
and
> > > > > > > getting 2.3 to GA.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Clinton
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 12/1/06, Jeff Butler <jeffgbutler@gmail.com >
wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We discussed this some weeks ago.  IIRC, Clinton wanted
to
> > > > > > > > do a new release rather than voting for GA on 2.2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jeff Butler
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 12/1/06, Brandon Goodin <brandon.goodin@gmail.com
>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Curious why we are superceding 2.2 wit 2.3? 2.2
has been
> > > > > > > > > available for some time and contains several
bug fixes over
> > > > > > > > > 2.1.7. I would also say that 2.2.0 could be made
GA. The
> > > > > > > > > other thought is that there is no guarantee that
2.3 will
> > > > > > > > > be GA quality after we get it out there for 2
weeks, however unlikely that
> > > > > > > > > may be. Thanks for getting this all together!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > B
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 11/30/06, Jeff Butler <jeffgbutler@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have everything built for 2.3, and have
everything
> > > > > > > > > > signed and checksummed.  Unfortunately,
there are permission problems in the
> > > > > > > > > > .../dist directories, so I'm stuck right
now.  I've sent a note to infra@
> > > > > > > > > > and as soon as they get the permission problems
resolved, then I'll be able
> > > > > > > > > > to publish the release.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This will be the first iBATIS/Java release
that uses the
> > > > > > > > > > Apache mirroring structure - I'm going to
implement the new Apache release
> > > > > > > > > > policy according to the notice the committers
received a couple of weeks
> > > > > > > > > > ago.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > My release plan looks like this:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1. Post the 2.3 and 2.1.7 builds to the
mirrors.  2.3will superceed
> > > > > > > > > > 2.2, so no need to post it
> > > > > > > > > > 2. Label 2.3 as beta, 2.1.7 is still the
GA release
> > > > > > > > > > 3. Call for a vote for 2.3 GA two weeks
after 2.3 is
> > > > > > > > > > posted
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'll keep you posted - hopefully I'll get
it done
> > > > > > > > > > tomorrow.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Jeff Butler
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message