Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65804 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 14:25:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 14:25:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 19975 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2005 14:25:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-dev-archive@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 19959 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2005 14:25:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ibatis.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ibatis.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 19943 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2005 14:25:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:25:14 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of bdruth@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.198] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:25:08 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so171136wra for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:24:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=sN0fjKW+lsyt2VC+Fo1l1V7Y0EujZy/XElUbn3DJrSAsHSx9L4MiYCzHmI0ufcFS9CXvCtj1KTkJ1RL61mdtryU6vyeqVCHs+Ocg9HpO4Kun4bR8k0pL+9iZTSNVT3Pbs4w0obFbUqHxIruuj4IXkm7ApnGKqQJBkj9u4eA33LE= Received: by 10.54.100.2 with SMTP id x2mr3376455wrb; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.68.20 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:24:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:24:52 -0600 From: Brice Ruth To: dev@ibatis.apache.org, husted@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Promote iBATIS 2.1.6 to General Availability In-Reply-To: <8b3ce3790511060619q7c597e62n51531f3f32efbfae@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_15101_13518724.1131287092780" References: <16178eb10511060004g4c0ae2f4w555ce7a33615b1df@mail.gmail.com> <8b3ce3790511060619q7c597e62n51531f3f32efbfae@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_15101_13518724.1131287092780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Ah, right - so your 'current' ability to support the release is an importan= t factor, as important as verifying that the release 'works'. Gotcha. Thanks! On 11/6/05, Ted Husted wrote: > > The main thing is that the parts that you do use work for you, and > that you would be willing to help support the release through mailing > list posts and source code patches. > > As a committer, a +1 also implies that you would be available to > review and apply patches -- even to the bits you don't use yourself. > > If the bits you use work for you, and you would be willing to help > support the release as a whole, then a +1 would be a reasonable vote. > > People often vote +0 when it works for them, but other obligations > would keep them from actively support the release at this time. (For > example, you're in the middle of a "death march" at work.) > > -Ted. > > On 11/6/05, Brice Ruth wrote: > > Clinton - > > > > There's quite a few enhancements/fixes that I wouldn't be able to test > out > > or anything, because anything I'm doing just doesn't exercise that code= . > Do > > I just vote +0 for myself, or how does the voting procedure work in tha= t > > case? > -- Brice Ruth Software Engineer, Madison WI ------=_Part_15101_13518724.1131287092780 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Ah, right - so your 'current' ability to support the release is an important factor, as important as verifying that the release 'works'. Gotcha.

Thanks!

On 11/6/05, Ted Husted <t= ed.husted@gmail.com> wrote:
The main thing is that the parts that you do use work for you, and
that = you would be willing to help support the release through mailing
list po= sts and source code patches.

As a committer, a +1 also implies that = you would be available to
review and apply patches -- even to the bits you don't use yourself.
If the bits you use work for you, and you would be willing to help
= support the release as a whole, then a +1 would be a reasonable vote.

People often vote +0 when it works for them, but other obligations
w= ould keep them from actively support the release at this time. (For
exam= ple, you're in the middle of a "death march" at work.)

-Ted.

On 11/6/05, Brice Ruth <bdruth@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clinton -
>
> &nb= sp;There's quite a few enhancements/fixes that I wouldn't be able to test o= ut
> or anything, because anything I'm doing just doesn't exercise th= at code. Do
> I just vote +0 for myself, or how does the voting procedure work i= n that
> case?



-- Brice Ruth
Software Engineer, Madison WI ------=_Part_15101_13518724.1131287092780--