httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject [users@httpd] Flood 0.4 status? (was: flood 0.4 was never signed for?)
Date Fri, 01 Sep 2017 16:39:38 GMT
What's our position on this? Is it time to declare flood abandoned?

Are there any users of this tool who want to contribute to maintaining it?

Offhand, I expect it does not support TLS/SNI. Nor HTTP/2.

If abandoned, we can simply remove www.a.o/dist/httpd/flood
to resolve Daniel's issue. If not abandoned, regenerating the
tarball from should result in the same file, which can then be
signed.

Thoughts?



On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbedooh@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It appears that flood 0.4 (
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/httpd/flood/ ) was never
> signed by anyone, which should likely be fixed. As this was, AIUI,
> released 8 years ago, I cannot in good conscience sign for it myself.
>
> Either we have someone who was present back then sign for it, or we
> should remove the release, pursuant to our release policy.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message