Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3C8200C5C for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:57:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B7031160B9F; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CB47160B90 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:57:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 34495 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2017 20:57:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 34485 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2017 20:57:53 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:57:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 51121181059 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:57:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.302 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.302 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xiV5MjuuKDjp for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [50.253.254.3]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E12835F1D5 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1777623AB for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:57:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id CWPPnEdks4bC for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:57:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lx120e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A98A8623AA for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:57:35 -0400 (EDT) To: users@httpd.apache.org From: Robert Moskowitz Message-ID: <0598ed17-e35c-a663-03e6-97e640b399fa@htt-consult.com> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:57:27 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [users@httpd] Does Apache need to delay startup until system time set? archived-at: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:57:55 -0000 This is for Centos7 on an armv7 SOC with no clock battery. On startup, Centos runs Chronyd which eventually sets the system clock. This can happen really fast, or not depending. I have learned that it is NOT a good thing for postfix to start when the system time is earlier than the build date of postfix. There is a way for me to delay postfix start until the time is set. Does Apache also have this concern not to start until the time is 'fixed'? thanks --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org