Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E251B200BFF for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:36:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E0D3F160B46; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 36B49160B43 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:36:47 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 65514 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2017 12:36:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 65504 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2017 12:36:45 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:36:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4BCDC1A0822 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:36:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.379 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z1Sdes7n1USI for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-f180.google.com (mail-ot0-f180.google.com [74.125.82.180]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8B08C5FB0F for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 65so62386809otq.2 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 04:36:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=J84EGEFXunKvcjOntMWpStKvvJONilr1fpnerbTq0Hc=; b=doX9/qTkfDh+iAgkrclStfHEwnN4Rtjq9n1VZVvdjL2scl1vbb8ifqFmZlcOjJRs+p RTp+AlH2Hie4paWPV1tXWSSPSa3HKlcLW8ydNUVEevCn5gOzG59aC9aCdVhfIUdnDgTd ykUTOYvcehMRMb5sUHtB9Xj3vdRRub2IRn/W2kRnkA7nmh9OGu4WRiO6TgTCx3nqh2Cc VATCTTzcCxyAHZ8aWs5rIo5GbqjhYAjihAvLCr4xrsBNDPjxAUOVRqLhDT1d7KZPdI5L bku/yPiWyvC2kiOMrHrR+MEn0AwhVC5I2tATJrhqZREmjvZ2fv127NQRZ4oAKx76XVk5 Ai5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=J84EGEFXunKvcjOntMWpStKvvJONilr1fpnerbTq0Hc=; b=GqAzjwWmmIoq9aoR4RSIuK07Tt1t9pwHyS9PbKJxLUsG5p2CBNbUGrzgMFzLRuHN1o QdmGKx9WzoAQqN+PblD5l3JmYrietSu95Sr8TC6oetzb3GJBXLyq3+uRTiVB8T4AxPzg 8gVyIl6Zvqw4ex7zyInv0M14tCVD4yUGL3F7bwkTN6MEt284DqtYl8iV0abFzzjANWTk fb73WhfSJM3doZIcaPTweMRncu+y+/m5bYpEHWepFqKm7NLecJcQzTwQ01O7H2jhqOg3 XDVUqY5s5BPAB/mEq1iK29hsm/cyW32p1DNr4cosDxGB0YXEmFqq6wRLqsJAoJHGu0Tc VRTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLaeC09OIyiOtlXsivYRKgdoxe9AtktyXJjLs2pnqDkK5IG9BzE2ceG4FLrJsGJO6wYyFxoevval6x6Jg== X-Received: by 10.157.47.34 with SMTP id h31mr12744588otb.242.1484656600728; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 04:36:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.18.209 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 04:36:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eric Covener Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:36:40 -0500 Message-ID: To: users@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Simultaneous users vs Concurrent users archived-at: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:36:48 -0000 On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Duong Tuan An wrote: > I have spent time to find out what is different between Simultaneous users > and Concurrent users. However, there are many different results and I'm > confusing now. IMO the definitions are not really very crisp/formal/portable. These two in particular are not ones I'd expect to be contrasted against eachther, unless they are very carefully defined in a certain context. Generally I have seen terms like "virtual" or "simulated" users to describe a very large value that may be idle or not connected at all to represent the usage pattern. Then almost any other term refers to users who are actually actively making requests. -- Eric Covener covener@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org