Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C54D200BCC for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:43:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 7AFB7160B15; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 22:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C2CD6160AFC for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:43:16 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 64647 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2016 22:43:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 64637 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2016 22:43:15 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 22:43:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0269DC1506 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 22:43:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.398 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XesBMoyqlO3v for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 22:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com (mail-io0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D4B6A5F480 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 22:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f172.google.com with SMTP id a124so317453028ioe.2 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:43:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=86sb3mMB2eS5+aSIxSOltd1LYk3CoPa1I9qw5VZG2I4=; b=WIicrxGVUEU5sjiFB0MDRyZqh7rc7WDgJxefV0CCbBW6O6JEm9JwTn0sjn8xp+QA33 EqgAn9u9GObdsEoTD3TsXsuvc3uyM6i4wyCBInAKZCyum02Awkxch+2vUoi/cWBwFYkC 4siL8m3LIZIH05Hnmk55AOkTZAzMvolfy6h0WWxtzUrrzE82NS+6AiDIuk/zVC5dQXMZ cVUYsTqjmcaIFPRUccdFKF4sFvWcEvis5ipb+diBjTWp4gPzhKeIS8sQy3tl6cYlK1cm QnSNQDsGND1Ze+wNHDIkdl0ET7akPZ611hmV2RfNdB2lVKYlMsLyV12Y6hb8+Kj84xbX u3hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=86sb3mMB2eS5+aSIxSOltd1LYk3CoPa1I9qw5VZG2I4=; b=nG4q4sQYCPNc2zxaVInpfxWtaEwAMmO+Ah+T8/T86xv4keWy6pU9zpIM/1lxsFzhw9 UT/cKcQTlYTLYyzVRld+OizeeNeeedgBiBWc5KQe8WZhlxwYUl4+r3jVVHUVmt+yejuw gZUYuXybYZaxAbw/Xf8GXdcK6ZsHDw3vn2mKHreLSsEQkiLRc658lYd06UO1SmAzd94k vDuaaYCBkRpCalS91AyNbRtQPcuKcwzBOficsoZ2oWrTlyQk+Z3VA3Bq1s+xH9DA4g/d Gkn0bI4BMFajYnre/Ac3ekLRAp6eQuJlPSo2GFmES5eZRVpUpEhGTSLUyN7kd5RtdITl ii/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03gP9K8mMUkdDju6qHUayYa0OhW30c73ZbVcBtPUxwFnru1pPqLcNuaaq36Nprxa8pCUzfk//CvZHJC4A== X-Received: by 10.107.139.74 with SMTP id n71mr25996619iod.166.1480459301494; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:41:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.17.83 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:41:41 -0800 (PST) From: Lars Bonnesen Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:41:41 +0100 Message-ID: To: users@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c05be08c525050542784a90 Subject: [users@httpd] Http sessions seems to get mixed with Apache SSL offload/reverse proxy for Exchange 2013 server archived-at: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 22:43:17 -0000 --94eb2c05be08c525050542784a90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It seems that when a Mac client tries to access an Exchange 2013 server having an Apache reverse proxy (non-caching) in between a number a strange issues are seen: 1) Inbox come and go from time to time. ... and what is even worse 2) Mail send from one person seems to arrive from another. 3) Mails destined for other users gets mixed into some users mailbox (that is... they are in the Mac inbox but not on OWA) We only see this on Mac clients. Never on App from Google Play or iStore. Never on Outlook clients connection within the local LAN (can't connect with outlook from external LAN as Apache does not like the http RPC that MS uses). I was originally posting the case here: https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/90090d72-3c49-4dbb-a1a9-72c20dcb1336/macclients-gets-mails-mixed-from-other-users?forum=exchangesvrclients#af954ae8-47d6-41e1-a320-03badf17374a and one of the suggestions was to take Apache out of the chain. I would like to keep it there though - If I can manage to solve the three issues mentioned above. Has anyone seen something like this - and if so, did you manage to solve it? Regards, Lars. --94eb2c05be08c525050542784a90 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It seems that when a Mac client tries to access an Exchang= e 2013 server having an Apache reverse proxy (non-caching) in between a num= ber a strange issues are seen:

1) Inbox come and go= from time to time.

... and what is even worse

2) Mail send from one person seems to arrive from ano= ther.

3) Mails destined for other users gets mixed= into some users mailbox (that is... they are in the Mac inbox but not on O= WA)

We only see this on Mac clients. Never o= n App from Google Play or iStore. Never on Outlook clients connection withi= n the local LAN (can't connect with outlook from external LAN as Apache= does not like the http RPC that MS uses).

I w= as originally posting the case here:


and one of t= he suggestions was to take Apache out of the chain.

I would like to keep it there though - If I can manage to solve the three= issues mentioned above.

Has anyone seen something= like this - and if so, did you manage to solve it?

Regards, Lars.


--94eb2c05be08c525050542784a90--