Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 006A9191C2 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54862 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2016 14:25:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54822 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2016 14:25:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54806 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2016 14:25:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:25:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5C267C064A for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:25:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.802 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IXWDfC7gz6Fb for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D7C745F1BE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id o126so73363497iod.0 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 07:25:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=cKCwwTbF9CKjr0ZNeG82SvZun3gyi9dh4hur/gap07c=; b=gnWXAyVcWz5b8Z8vvMmJdS+xrPeVezxKV97mJ1r3cKeBUwX96MXa8quyk0EPMiERi1 tDAho+xSV7nUu6Jmq41rdvN15SkE9vlXGVlMCL0/PndMlzYOIy9Gcavb+uOcLKkBJWzS BTe5g1hQudlbjIk+CWV5ZyB68mpAZD6jpfhXHlKQmGQKG4ydFdjvvW2GKak/BAaQiK8G uLw2Yuh1uoPAe2+31c3NoyREggOpb2sOZNNt76rDAPOuNtyLqnjnTmBShBl56sDLepgM P1yH+maq898vGgs8ZeI1xJnaprkaqhyiWjcBWDkWuS0P7VbSq6YXhlbYX4hWpcfFDBsA OEQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=cKCwwTbF9CKjr0ZNeG82SvZun3gyi9dh4hur/gap07c=; b=BtMP+lHfkvboQpfjbDqpWqH/0SUJFG7JrQsSrTmA83P/hn/Oxy+ebOiI6ico25ltFl 4d7uTrT3W5gr7uwch4ujfvvx8jX6eXO6vZn7g+lTJ9nsdlt8/reFZ2uqrX3IHck07CB+ PoYIzUJjcpLhJPGiNwZ9Fn3lgsu1PWuamcYIgj72t0gdUIoIntoaO76iobt7ZEWy5N9G mI70snDbRUIs6bLEouEZyNMxG51HdL1kmxG/vkEi0cXW2tFfPoLTWtRWd9dogz//Fmw9 +0NOos3U9sYe6EBh1m60Ue1xaQ1xUyqpmGebUY/E02Zo4r9WER1UZ3H7jrV1wos5ni9P fkJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKvVgDFLePl68WsO9P826Bo3Or9LZom/yR7nmpQPn3mB9ITkSKFNQW59Lzl5hRCy184qCTKklrCRO1etQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.25.139 with SMTP id 133mr3912165ioz.90.1460039103018; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 07:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.39.16 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 07:25:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56FE8505.4060706@leopold.priv.at> References: <56FE8505.4060706@leopold.priv.at> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:25:02 -0400 Message-ID: From: Eric Covener To: users@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy_fcgi connection reuse with PHP-FPM and UDS On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Matthias Leopold wrote: > I'd like to use it with a unix domain socket, the "Proxy via Handler" > example uses the "enablereuse" directive, the "PHP-FPM with UDS" example > (ProxyPassMatch) says "# UDS does not currently support connection reuse". > What is true now and when should i use "enablereuse"? For a long stretch of 2.4.x, reuse was forced off for mod_proxy_fcgi over TCP. Because it was that way for so long, it is opt-in. The benefit is some reduced latency in dispatching a request to a FCGI server. I am not sure why UDS connections aren't pooled/reusable. Probably just never implemented. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org