Return-Path: 
 <users-return-113049-apmail-httpd-users-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B90E518DE7
	for <apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:52:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 72827 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2016 08:52:32 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72780 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2016 08:52:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:users-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@httpd.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72770 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2016 08:52:31 -0000
Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO
 spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:52:31 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org)
 with ESMTP id 64315180492
	for <users@httpd.apache.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:52:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.43
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.43 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.329, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new);
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=freshdot.net
Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
	by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10024)
	with ESMTP id HejXiTYSkk5I for <users@httpd.apache.org>;
	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:52:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dot.freshdot.net (dot.freshdot.net [213.154.236.176])
	by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS
 id 9283F5FB90
	for <users@httpd.apache.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:52:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sanders by dot.freshdot.net with local (Exim 4.82)
	(envelope-from <ssmeenk@freshdot.net>)
	id 1aZE8M-0002T3-4C; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:52:22 +0100
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:52:22 +0100
From: Sander Smeenk <ssmeenk@freshdot.net.INVALID>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Message-ID: <20160226085222.GC2258@dot.dmz.freshdot.net>
Mail-Followup-To: users@httpd.apache.org
References: <43A4D4E1-9745-4416-A6E6-130970DA13FA@utk.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43A4D4E1-9745-4416-A6E6-130970DA13FA@utk.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] mpm-itk questions

Quoting Rose, John B (jbrose@utk.edu):

> Curious about any experience using mpm-itk. Pros and cons? 

There's a dedicated mpm-itk mailinglist at
http://lists.err.no/mailman/listinfo/mpm-itk

Also, i'm running an entire shared hosting farm on mpm-itk
with no problems at all; aside from recent developments where libcap2
capabilities were introduced in mpm-itk for added security which break
NFS-mounted storage. However, using libcap2 capabilities is now an
option in the latest mpm-itk release.

Regards,
-Sndr
-- 
| Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
| 4096R/20CC6CD2 - 6D40 1A20 B9AA 87D4 84C7  FBD6 F3A9 9442 20CC 6CD2

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org