httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rose, John B" <jbr...@utk.edu>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] Circumstances when mod_php would run faster than PHP-FPM?
Date Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:51:55 GMT
After switching to mod_php from php-fpm we are told the site is working 4x faster using mod_php
instead of php-fpm.

Any explanation?

Thanks

From: William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net<mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net>>
Reply-To: "users@httpd.apache.org<mailto:users@httpd.apache.org>" <users@httpd.apache.org<mailto:users@httpd.apache.org>>
Date: Saturday, January 9, 2016 1:58 PM
To: "users@httpd.apache.org<mailto:users@httpd.apache.org>" <users@httpd.apache.org<mailto:users@httpd.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Circumstances when mod_php would run faster than PHP-FPM?


Mod_proxy_fcgi + php-fpm or mod_fcgid with php fcgi sapi should both be equivalent when tuned
correctly.

Your only option for running php in process efficiently is to use the non-threadsafe php in
the httpd preform module.  Your only option for running httpd efficiently is the event, or
at least the worker mpm.

Since usually only a subset of the http requests are to a php resource, the answer is almost
always 'no'.

On Jan 8, 2016 16:48, "Rose, John B" <jbrose@utk.edu<mailto:jbrose@utk.edu>> wrote:
Apache 2.4

On the same system, same web site, are there circumstances when Apache using mod_php would
run faster than Apache using PHP-FPM?

Thanks

Mime
View raw message