httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kurtis Rader <kra...@skepticism.us>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] Is this a flaw or not?
Date Sun, 18 Oct 2015 14:56:14 GMT
Why are you asking the users@httpd.apache.org mailing list this question?
This mailing list is for questions about using the Apache HTTP web server.
No one reading this mailing list is going to help you with a Fedora OS
problem.

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:44 AM, fedora <fedora@ayni.com> wrote:

> Hi listers
>
> I have a workstation with two disks:
>
> [root@casablanca ~]# parted -l
> Model: ATA WDC WD20EFRX-68E (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sda: 2000GB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
> Partition Table: gpt
> Disk Flags: pmbr_boot
>
> Number  Start   End     Size    File system  Name                 Flags
>  1      20.5kB  262MB   262MB                BIOS boot partition  bios_grub
>  2      262MB   21.7GB  21.5GB  ext4         Linux filesystem
>  3      21.7GB  32.5GB  10.7GB  swsusp       Linux swap
>  4      32.5GB  870GB   838GB   ext4         Linux filesystem
>  5      870GB   900GB   30.0GB  ext4         Linux filesystem
>  6      900GB   2000GB  1100GB  btrfs
>
>
> Model: ATA WDC WD10EADS-00L (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sdb: 1000GB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: msdos
> Disk Flags:
>
> Number  Start   End     Size    Type     File system     Flags
>  1      1049kB  52.4GB  52.4GB  primary  xfs             boot
>  2      52.4GB  61.1GB  8703MB  primary  linux-swap(v1)
>  3      61.1GB  1000GB  939GB   primary  xfs
>
>
> [root@casablanca ~]#
>
> NOTE: the first disk has got a gpt partition table and a BIOS boot
> partition, the second has got an msdos partition table.
> Both disks have got fedora 22 installed. They can run independently from
> one another.
> ----------
>
> Just now, I did an update
>
> dnf update
> ...
> ...
> ...
>
> on both disks. I rebooted both disks.
>
> The result on the first disk (with gpt partition table) is this:
> [root@thunder ~]# uname -r
> 4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64
> [root@thunder ~]#
>
> [root@thunder ~]# dnf list installed |grep kernel |sort
> abrt-addon-kerneloops.x86_64            2.6.1-2.fc22  @System
> kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
> kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.4-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
> kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.4-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
> kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.4-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
> kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-headers.x86_64                   4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-modules-extra.x86_64             4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
> kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
> kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
> kernel.x86_64                           4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
> kernel.x86_64                           4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
> kernel.x86_64                           4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
> libreport-plugin-kerneloops.x86_64      2.6.2-1.fc22  @System
> [root@thunder ~]#
>
>
> Apparently, the kernel 4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64 is not installed, but the
> machine according to uname -r
> booted from it?????
>
> ------
>
> The result on the second disk (with msdos partition table) is this:
>
> [root@casablanca ~]# uname -r
> 4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64
> [root@casablanca ~]#
>
> [root@casablanca ~]# dnf list installed |grep kernel |sort
> abrt-addon-kerneloops.x86_64            2.6.1-5.fc22 @updates
> kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-core.x86_64                                        @updates
> kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-headers.x86_64                   4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel.x86_64                           4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel.x86_64                           4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
> kernel.x86_64                           4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
> libreport-plugin-kerneloops.x86_64      2.6.2-4.fc22 @updates
> [root@casablanca ~]#
>
> Here, the kernel 4.2.3-200.fc22 is installed and the machine according to
> uname -r booted from it.
>
> ---------
>
> Does the BIOS boot partition  make the difference? Can anybody explain
> this strange behaviour?
>
> Thanks for your attention.
>
> suomi
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Kurtis Rader
Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank

Mime
View raw message