httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From fedora <fed...@ayni.com>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] Is this a flaw or not?
Date Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:33:02 GMT
Thanks, Kurtis, for the hint, I just did not observe this....

suomi

On 10/18/2015 04:56 PM, Kurtis Rader wrote:
> Why are you asking the users@httpd.apache.org
> <mailto:users@httpd.apache.org> mailing list this question? This mailing
> list is for questions about using the Apache HTTP web server. No one
> reading this mailing list is going to help you with a Fedora OS problem.
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:44 AM, fedora <fedora@ayni.com
> <mailto:fedora@ayni.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi listers
>
>     I have a workstation with two disks:
>
>     [root@casablanca ~]# parted -l
>     Model: ATA WDC WD20EFRX-68E (scsi)
>     Disk /dev/sda: 2000GB
>     Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
>     Partition Table: gpt
>     Disk Flags: pmbr_boot
>
>     Number  Start   End     Size    File system  Name                 Flags
>       1      20.5kB  262MB   262MB                BIOS boot partition
>     bios_grub
>       2      262MB   21.7GB  21.5GB  ext4         Linux filesystem
>       3      21.7GB  32.5GB  10.7GB  swsusp       Linux swap
>       4      32.5GB  870GB   838GB   ext4         Linux filesystem
>       5      870GB   900GB   30.0GB  ext4         Linux filesystem
>       6      900GB   2000GB  1100GB  btrfs
>
>
>     Model: ATA WDC WD10EADS-00L (scsi)
>     Disk /dev/sdb: 1000GB
>     Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
>     Partition Table: msdos
>     Disk Flags:
>
>     Number  Start   End     Size    Type     File system     Flags
>       1      1049kB  52.4GB  52.4GB  primary  xfs             boot
>       2      52.4GB  61.1GB  8703MB  primary  linux-swap(v1)
>       3      61.1GB  1000GB  939GB   primary  xfs
>
>
>     [root@casablanca ~]#
>
>     NOTE: the first disk has got a gpt partition table and a BIOS boot
>     partition, the second has got an msdos partition table.
>     Both disks have got fedora 22 installed. They can run independently
>     from one another.
>     ----------
>
>     Just now, I did an update
>
>     dnf update
>     ...
>     ...
>     ...
>
>     on both disks. I rebooted both disks.
>
>     The result on the first disk (with gpt partition table) is this:
>     [root@thunder ~]# uname -r
>     4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64
>     [root@thunder ~]#
>
>     [root@thunder ~]# dnf list installed |grep kernel |sort
>     abrt-addon-kerneloops.x86_64            2.6.1-2.fc22  @System
>     kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
>     kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.4-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
>     kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.4-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
>     kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.4-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
>     kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-headers.x86_64                   4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-modules-extra.x86_64             4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
>     kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel.x86_64                           4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
>     kernel.x86_64                           4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
>     kernel.x86_64                           4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
>     libreport-plugin-kerneloops.x86_64      2.6.2-1.fc22  @System
>     [root@thunder ~]#
>
>
>     Apparently, the kernel 4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64 is not installed, but
>     the machine according to uname -r
>     booted from it?????
>
>     ------
>
>     The result on the second disk (with msdos partition table) is this:
>
>     [root@casablanca ~]# uname -r
>     4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64
>     [root@casablanca ~]#
>
>     [root@casablanca ~]# dnf list installed |grep kernel |sort
>     abrt-addon-kerneloops.x86_64            2.6.1-5.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-core.x86_64                                        @updates
>     kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-headers.x86_64                   4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel.x86_64                           4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel.x86_64                           4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
>     kernel.x86_64                           4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
>     libreport-plugin-kerneloops.x86_64      2.6.2-4.fc22 @updates
>     [root@casablanca ~]#
>
>     Here, the kernel 4.2.3-200.fc22 is installed and the machine
>     according to uname -r booted from it.
>
>     ---------
>
>     Does the BIOS boot partition  make the difference? Can anybody
>     explain this strange behaviour?
>
>     Thanks for your attention.
>
>     suomi
>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>     <mailto:users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
>     For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>     <mailto:users-help@httpd.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kurtis Rader
> Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message