Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20D8A18ABE for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95844 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2015 15:43:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 95810 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2015 15:43:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 95797 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2015 15:43:46 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:43:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8E8C6F3335 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:43:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.12 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.12 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EH3VaFeaEj0m for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com [209.85.213.174]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 824DE206E8 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so37694180igb.0 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:43:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7jYKOgV2egea9+m+6c4qE0Mxj3aJIIk0r1qyvj39Abw=; b=tfyqoJ8mTOuSf2fwyriz766QRmFLh2aRsZD2PpPaCtQ1tUCv7amH6Tgw7Oc5gS4194 xom5bGF8Al8Jni7joGtQaN3mhzp+YXss+y2hBB1eSvqMvNtqh7209gwgypUaNj/bQ7wp YfwtKi9YJIQntQGmRtUwS7Z9iywACDDg6uGS7wJjnlwl3FfPLnMChzlYdv05ilDIQwUa X9KXbiYQLqK1+6WqD945Gov5wQWuXxYGiaUbkkxAvLYyiGMpbZ5UkmYMco2mqx+bYU30 Jy83K+lbSfTqZ36IWVNy9nI6EejCe1DwxGiD2ONY/cGTH3RQn5braoJLzeyEbLk51knv NIqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.78.41 with SMTP id y9mr16567717igw.72.1442418220002; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.25.3 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:43:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:43:39 -0400 Message-ID: From: Eric Covener To: users@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache and SPDY On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Rose, John B wrote: > Is SPDY something that the typical Apache 2.2 or 2.4 installation should be > utilizing as of September 2015? > No, if anything look into mod_h2 if you have a requirement in this area > Are there any reasons to NOT use SPDY? Yes, the protocol seems abandoned due to http/2, and the module is effectively abandoned and never saw widespread use. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org